Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22983037›Full record

ArticleThe Biological bulletin2012

Strategies of genomic integration within insect-bacterial mutualisms.

Jennifer J Wernegreen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biological bulletin, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Insect symbionts in food webs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Small but Mighty: Cell Size and Bacteria.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Bacterial genome instability.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2014
    Review
  16. Interwoven biology of the tsetse holobiont.Journal of bacteriology · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer J WernegreenNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. j.wernegreen@duke.edu
Duke University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF ENDOSYMBIOSISR01GM062626 · NIGMS · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI WERNEGREEN, JENNIFER JO · 2001 to 2010
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects, the most diverse group of macroorganisms with 900,000 known species, have been a rich playground for the evolution of symbiotic associations. Symbionts of this enormous animal group include a range of microbial partners. Insects are prone to establishing relationships with intracellular bacteria, which include the most intimate, highly integrated mutualisms known in the biological world. In recent years, an explosion of genomic studies has offered new insights into the molecular, functional, and evolutionary consequences of these insect-bacterial partnerships. In this review, I highlight some insights from genome sequences of bacterial endosymbionts and select insect hosts. Notably, comparisons between facultative and obligate bacterial mutualists have revealed distinct genome features representing different stages along a shared trajectory of genome reduction. Bacteria associated with the cedar aphid offer a snapshot of a transition from facultative to obligate mutualism, illustrating the genomic basis of this key step along the symbiotic spectrum. In addition, genomes of stable, dual bacterial symbionts reflect independent instances of astonishing metabolic integration. In these systems, synthesis of key nutrients, and perhaps basic cellular processes, require collaboration among co-residing bacteria and their insect host. These findings provide a launching point for a new era of genomic explorations of bacterial-animal symbioses. Future studies promise to reveal symbiotic strategies across a broad ecological and phylogenetic range, to clarify key transitions along a spectrum of interaction types, and to fuel new experimental approaches to dissect the mechanistic basis of intimate host-symbiont associations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBacterial Physiological PhenomenaEvolution, MolecularSymbiosisAnimalsBacteriaGenome, BacterialGenome, InsectGenome SizeInsecta

Identifiers

PMID22983037
PMCPMC3609409
OpenAlexW1885885849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.