Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22981880›Full record

ArticleTheriogenology2012

Genome resource banking of biomedically important laboratory animals.

Yuksel Agca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theriogenology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Cryopreservation of Rodent Ovarian Tissues and Oocytes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fertility preservation through gonadal cryopreservation.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2016
    Review
  18. Cryotolerance of Sperm from Transgenic Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yuksel AgcaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA. agcay@missouri.edu

Funding

MUTANT MOUSE RESOURCE AND RESEARCH CENTER: ANIMAL EMBRYONIC STEM CELLSU42RR014821 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI FRANKLIN, CRAIG L · 2000 to 2011
$15.8M
RAT RESOURCE &RESEARCH CENTER: MODELS OF HUMAN DISEASEP40RR016939 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI BRYDA, ELIZABETH C · 2001 to 2011
$14.7M
Rat sperm cryobanking for genetic resourcesR21RR025913 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI AGCA, YUKSEL · 2009 to 2010
$363k
NCRR NIH HHS P40 RR016939NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR025913NCRR NIH HHS U42 RR014821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome resource banking is the systematic collection, storage, and redistribution of biomaterials in an organized, logistical, and secure manner. Genome cryobanks usually contain biomaterials and associated genomic information essential for progression of biomedicine, human health, and research. In that regard, appropriate genome cryobanks could provide essential biomaterials for both current and future research projects in the form of various cell types and tissues, including sperm, oocytes, embryos, embryonic or adult stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and gonadal tissues. In addition to cryobanked germplasm, cryobanking of DNA, serum, blood products, and tissues from scientifically, economically, and ecologically important species has become a common practice. For revitalization of the whole organism, cryopreserved germplasm in conjunction with assisted reproductive technologies, offer a powerful approach for research model management, as well as assisting in animal production for agriculture, conservation, and human reproductive medicine. Recently, many developed and developing countries have allocated substantial resources to establish genome resources banks which are responsible for safeguarding scientifically, economically, and ecologically important wild type, mutant, and transgenic plants, fish, and local livestock breeds, as well as wildlife species. This review is dedicated to the memory of Dr. John K. Critser, who has made profound contributions to the science of cryobiology and establishment of genome research and resources centers for mice, rats, and swine. Emphasis will be given to application of genome resource banks to species with substantial contributions to the advancement of biomedicine and human health.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenomeAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryBreedingCryopreservationDNAEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFishesLivestockMaleMiceMice, TransgenicOocytesPlants, Genetically ModifiedDNA

Identifiers

PMID22981880
PMCPMC3939794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.