ArticleGlobal journal of health science2012
Determinants of the utilization of diversified types of professionals for mental health reasons in a Montreal (Canadian) catchment area.
Article in Global journal of health science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Number of Healthcare Professionals Consulted by Individuals with Mental Disorders or High Psychological Distress.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Patient satisfaction with mental health services based on Andersen's Behavioral Model.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2018Article
- Predictors of frequent recourse to health professionals by people with severe mental disorders.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2015Article
- Predictors of healthcare service utilization for mental health reasons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014Article
- Determinants and patterns of service utilization and recourse to professionals for mental health reasons.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Developing a tool for mapping adult mental health care provision in Europe: the REMAST research protocol and its contribution to better integrated care.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study was designed to identify factors associated with the diversity of professionals consulted by 212 individuals affected by at least one mental disorder in the past 12 months in a Montreal catchment area. For inclusion in the study, participants had to be aged 15 to 65 and reside in the study zone. A comprehensive set of variables were analyzed in accordance with the Andersen's behavioural model of health service use. General practitioners, psychiatrists, and psychologists were the main professionals consulted in this study. Having post-secondary education, more than a single mental disorder, excellent relationships with neighbours, and (marginally) being a lifelong victim of violence were associated with higher numbers of professionals consulted. As this study highlights the large number of diversified professionals consulted for reason of mental disorders, shared care initiatives may prove beneficial. Greater effort could also be made in increasing services toward those deemed more vulnerable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.