Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22979849›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2012

Implicit ligand theory: rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking.

David D L Minh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Simple Entropy Terms for End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2018
    Article
  9. Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Implicit ligand theory for relative binding free energies.The Journal of chemical physics · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David D L MinhDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. dm225@duke.edu

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Center for Chemical DiversityP50GM067082 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WIPF, PETER · 2002 to 2012
$18.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS 2P50 GM-067082-06-10NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM067082PHS HHS N00014-11-1-0729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rigorous formalism for estimating noncovalent binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from calculations in which receptor configurations are sampled independently from the ligand is derived. Due to this separation, receptor configurations only need to be sampled once, facilitating the use of binding free energy calculations in virtual screening. Demonstrative calculations on a host-guest system yield good agreement with previous free energy calculations and isothermal titration calorimetry measurements. Implicit ligand theory provides guidance on how to improve existing molecular docking algorithms and insight into the concepts of induced fit and conformational selection in noncovalent macromolecular recognition.

Indexed as

LigandsModels, MolecularThermodynamicsMolecular Dynamics SimulationLigands

Identifiers

PMID22979849
PMCPMC3460968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.