Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22978722›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2012

A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach.

Anita Huis, Theo van Achterberg, Marijn de Bruin, Richard Grol, Lisette Schoonhoven, Marlies Hulscher

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03032887 (Reducing Visitors- and Personnel-associated Infection Risk by Special Agitation Incl. Voice Prompts for Hand Disinfection on Perinatal Care Stations), which is not on this map. Cited by 102 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03032887 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Visitors- and Personnel-associated Infection Risk by Special Agitation Incl. Voice Prompts for Hand Disinfection on Perinatal Care Stations

TypeinterventionalSponsorMartin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergRan2016 to 2019Enrolled300ConditionsHygieneArmsvoice prompts, agitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sticky apps, not sticky hands: A systematic review and content synthesis of hand hygiene mobile apps.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Hand-washing promotion for preventing diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Hand washing promotion for preventing diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Efficacy of interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in neonatal units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anita HuisScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. a.huis@iq.umcn.nl
Theo van Achterberg
Marijn de Bruin
Richard Grol
Lisette Schoonhoven
Marlies Hulscher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany strategies have been designed and evaluated to address the problem of low hand hygiene (HH) compliance. Which of these strategies are most effective and how they work is still unclear. Here we describe frequently used improvement strategies and related determinants of behaviour change that prompt good HH behaviour to provide a better overview of the choice and content of such strategies.

methodsSystematic searches of experimental and quasi-experimental research on HH improvement strategies were conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to November 2009. First, we extracted the study characteristics using the EPOC Data Collection Checklist, including study objectives, setting, study design, target population, outcome measures, description of the intervention, analysis, and results. Second, we used the Taxonomy of Behavioural Change Techniques to identify targeted determinants.

resultsWe reviewed 41 studies. The most frequently addressed determinants were knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation of behaviour. Fewer studies addressed social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, and intention. Thirteen studies used a controlled design to measure the effects of HH improvement strategies on HH behaviour. The effectiveness of the strategies varied substantially, but most controlled studies showed positive results. The median effect size of these strategies increased from 17.6 (relative difference) addressing one determinant to 49.5 for the studies that addressed five determinants.

conclusionsBy focussing on determinants of behaviour change, we found hidden and valuable components in HH improvement strategies. Addressing only determinants such as knowledge, awareness, action control, and facilitation is not enough to change HH behaviour. Addressing combinations of different determinants showed better results. This indicates that we should be more creative in the application of alternative improvement activities addressing determinants such as social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, or intention.

Indexed as

BehaviorHand DisinfectionAttitude of Health PersonnelCross InfectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfection ControlPersonnel, HospitalSelf EfficacySocial Environment

Identifiers

PMID22978722
PMCPMC3517511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.