Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22977600›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2011

Vascular endothelial growth factor +936C/T polymorphism and gastric cancer risk: A meta-analysis.

Li-Ping Zhou, Hong Luan, Xin-Hua Dong, Guo-Jiang Jin, Dong-Liang Man, Hong Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetics and gastric cancer susceptibility.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li-Ping ZhouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, P.R. China.
Hong Luan
Xin-Hua Dong
Guo-Jiang Jin
Dong-Liang Man
Hong Shang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) +936C/T polymorphism confers susceptibility to gastric cancer (GC) by conducting a meta-analysis. Publications addressing the association between the VEGF +936C/T polymorphism and GC risk were selected from the Pubmed, Embase and CBM databases. Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.25 and STATA 9.2 software. From these data, the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Finally, 8 case-control studies were retrieved reporting a total of 2,131 gastrointestinal cancer patients and 2,670 controls. Meta-analysis results showed that there was no significant association between the VEGF +936C/T polymorphism and GC risk in all comparisons of the T allele vs. C allele (OR=1.08, 95% CI 0.90-1.30, P=0.42), CT+TT vs. CC (OR=1.08, 95% CI 0.87-1.34, P=0.49), TT vs. CC+CT (OR=1.14, 95% CI 0.85-1.53, P=0.37), TT vs. CC (OR=1.18, 95% CI 0.87-1.59, P=0.28) and TT vs. CT (OR=1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.56, P=0.56). This meta-analysis confirms that there is a lack of association between the VEGF +936C/T polymorphism and GC risk.

Identifiers

PMID22977600
PMCPMC3440740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.