ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2011
Antitumor efficacy induced by a B16F10 tumor cell vaccine treated with mitoxantrone alone or in combination with reserpine and verapamil in mice.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparing the immunogenicity of glycosidase-directed resiquimod prodrugs mediated by cancer cell metabolism.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2020Article
- Non-Thermal Plasma as a Unique Delivery System of Short-Lived Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species for Immunogenic Cell Death in Melanoma Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019Article
- Polysaccharide-based nanoparticles for co-loading mitoxantrone and verapamil to overcome multidrug resistance in breast tumor.International journal of nanomedicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An apoptotic tumor cell serves as a potential potent trigger for the initiation of naturally occurring tumor immunity. In the present study, a B16F10 tumor cell vaccine treated with mitoxantrone (MIT) was developed, and its antitumor effect on mice was evaluated. The results indicated that the B16F10 tumor cell vaccine treated with MIT alone or in combination with reserpine (RP) and verapamil (VP) for 12 h triggered apoptosis, and that the expression of CD80, the MHC II class molecule, NKG2D and its ligand were significantly increased compared to the expression levels in the control group. The tumor vaccine immunogenicity was significantly enhanced in the vaccinated mice, resulting in augmented cytotoxicity of splenocytes and NK cells as well as the splenocyte proliferative response compared to the control group mice. Notably, the mice vaccinated with the B16F10 tumor cell vaccine treated with MIT, RP and VP did not generate tumors only after 60 days into the observation, but the mice also generated a powerful immune prophylactic efficiency against the B16F10 tumor cell challenge. These findings demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the B16F10 tumor cell vaccine treated with MIT alone or in combination with RP and VP in the murine model, and suggest that an apoptotic tumor cell vaccine modeled on naturally occurring tumor immune responses in vivo may provide a safe and immunogenic tumor vaccine for potential applications in humans.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.