ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2011
Phase I clinical trial of a novel peptide vaccine in combination with UFT/LV for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to peptide vaccination predicts survival in stage III colorectal cancer.Cancer science · 2018Trial
- Phase 1 study of OCV-C02, a peptide vaccine consisting of two peptide epitopes for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.Cancer science · 2017Trial
- Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of peptide vaccine treatment: based on the results of a phase II study on advanced pancreatic cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2017Trial
- Phase II clinical trial of peptide cocktail therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: VENUS-PC study.Cancer science · 2017Trial
- Phase I/II clinical trial using HLA-A24-restricted peptide vaccine derived from KIF20A for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2013Trial
- New Target(s) for RNF43 Regulation: Implications for Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Progress of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy for pMMR/MSS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Review
- Multiple Protein Biomarkers and Different Treatment Strategies for Colorectal Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Prospective.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Current and emerging therapeutic approaches for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- Resistance to targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: Current status and new developments.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Immunotherapies catering to the unmet medical need of cold colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Recent Advances on Immune Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer Using bi-Specific Antibodies and Therapeutic Vaccines.Biological procedures online · 2021Review
- High Expression of Tomm34 and Its Correlations With Clinicopathology in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2021Article
- Review
- Relationships Between Immune Landscapes, Genetic Subtypes and Responses to Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Colorectal cancer vaccines: Tumor-associated antigensWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Multicenter, phase II clinical trial of peptide vaccination with oral chemotherapy following curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- RT-qPCR analysis of the tumor antigens TOMM34 and RNF43 in samples extracted from paraffin-embedded specimens of colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Effective induction of cytotoxic T cells recognizing an epitope peptide derived from hypoxia-inducible protein 2 (HIG2) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2017Article
- The emerging role of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To test the safety and immune responses of a novel peptide vaccine derived from RNF43 (ring finger protein 43) and TOMM34 (34-kDa translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane) administered in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, a phase I clinical trial with 21 HLA-A2402-positive metastatic colorectal cancer patients was conducted. Patients received a weekly peptide vaccine (1 mg of each peptide in incomplete Freund's adjuvant) in combination with oral UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) and UZEL (75 mg/day) for 4 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest. The protocol consisted of at least two cycles of this regimen. After the 2nd cycle, vaccinations were given biweekly or monthly, depending on the condition of the patient. Clinical responses were judged 10 weeks after the 2nd cycle by performing computed tomography (CT) scans and assessing the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses against RNF43 and TOMM34 in peripheral lymphocytes. The vaccinations were well tolerated without any serious adverse events. CTL responses were induced against both antigens in 8 patients and against one antigen in 12 patients, while 1 patient had no CTL response. The rate of stable disease was 83%. The group with CTL responses against both antigens had the most long-term survivors, followed by the group showing CTL responses against one antigen (p=0.0079). The patients with no CTL responses had the lowest survival. The safety and immunological responsiveness of the present combination therapy suggests that it is clinically beneficial for metastatic colorectal cancer. Further clinical trials are warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.