Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22977472›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2011

Phase I clinical trial of a novel peptide vaccine in combination with UFT/LV for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Kiyotaka Okuno, Fumiaki Sugiura, Jin-Ichi Hida, Tadao Tokoro, Eizaburo Ishimaru, Yasushi Sukegawa, Kazuki Ueda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. New Target(s) for RNF43 Regulation: Implications for Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Colorectal cancer vaccines: Tumor-associated antigensWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The emerging role of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiyotaka OkunoDepartment of Surgery, and.
Fumiaki Sugiura
Jin-Ichi Hida
Tadao Tokoro
Eizaburo Ishimaru
Yasushi Sukegawa
Kazuki Ueda
Kindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To test the safety and immune responses of a novel peptide vaccine derived from RNF43 (ring finger protein 43) and TOMM34 (34-kDa translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane) administered in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, a phase I clinical trial with 21 HLA-A2402-positive metastatic colorectal cancer patients was conducted. Patients received a weekly peptide vaccine (1 mg of each peptide in incomplete Freund's adjuvant) in combination with oral UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) and UZEL (75 mg/day) for 4 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest. The protocol consisted of at least two cycles of this regimen. After the 2nd cycle, vaccinations were given biweekly or monthly, depending on the condition of the patient. Clinical responses were judged 10 weeks after the 2nd cycle by performing computed tomography (CT) scans and assessing the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses against RNF43 and TOMM34 in peripheral lymphocytes. The vaccinations were well tolerated without any serious adverse events. CTL responses were induced against both antigens in 8 patients and against one antigen in 12 patients, while 1 patient had no CTL response. The rate of stable disease was 83%. The group with CTL responses against both antigens had the most long-term survivors, followed by the group showing CTL responses against one antigen (p=0.0079). The patients with no CTL responses had the lowest survival. The safety and immunological responsiveness of the present combination therapy suggests that it is clinically beneficial for metastatic colorectal cancer. Further clinical trials are warranted.

Identifiers

PMID22977472
PMCPMC3440656
OpenAlexW2062173928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.