ArticleBMJ open2012
Cohort study of the association of hypnotic use with mortality in postmenopausal women.
Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship of psychotropic medication use with physical function among postmenopausal women.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Sleep disturbance and suicide risk among sexual and gender minority people.Neurobiology of stress · 2022Article
- Infra-low frequency neurofeedback and insomnia as a model of CNS dysregulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
- Article
- Sleep characteristics, light at night and breast cancer risk in a prospective cohort.International journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Age-dependent changes in the association between sleep duration and impaired glucose metabolism.World journal of diabetes · 2017Article
- Multimorbidity and use of hypnotic and anxiolytic drugs: cross-sectional and follow-up study in primary healthcare in Iceland.BMC family practice · 2016Article
- Mortality Risk of Hypnotics: Strengths and Limits of Evidence.Drug safety · 2016Review
- Hypnotic drug risks of mortality, infection, depression, and cancer: but lack of benefit.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Article
- Evidence for harm, comment on ‘Use of benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine related drugs and the risk of cancer: a population-based case-control study’.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Effect of anxiolytic and hypnotic drug prescriptions on mortality hazards: retrospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Article
- Association of hypnotics with stroke risk: a population-based case-control study.The primary care companion for CNS disorders · 2014Article
- Sleep duration, insomnia, and coronary heart disease among postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrevious studies found an association between hypnotic use and mortality risk. The prospective outcome data and the many baseline risk factors included in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) provide an opportunity to better understand the reasons for this association.
settingThe WHI is a long-term national health study that focused on strategies for preventing disease in postmenopausal women. Participants were enrolled from 1993 to 1998.
designBaseline hypnotic use was evaluated for an association with subsequent mortality or disease after adjusting for baseline risk. SUBJECTS: 148 938 postmenopausal women between the ages of 50 and 79 throughout the USA. The median follow-up was 8 years.
main outcome measuresMortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, diabetes and seven types of cancer.
resultsFor persons who use hypnotic medications almost daily the age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 1.62 (95% CI 1.50 to 1.74). Greater hypnotic use was associated with less healthy levels of physical function, general health and smoking at baseline. After adjustment for these factors the HR for almost daily hypnotic use was 1.14 (1.06 to 1.23) for mortality and 1.53 (1.18 to 1.99) for melanoma; it was not significantly associated with increased incidence of other diseases tested. Less frequent hypnotic use and several types of sleeping difficulties were not associated with mortality, but sleeping more than 10 h a night had a risk-adjusted HR for mortality of 1.28 (1.01 to 1.61).
conclusionsThe association of hypnotic use with mortality and incident disease was greatly reduced after adjusting for baseline risk factors. These findings do not support a strong independent association of hypnotic use with most health outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.