Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22976801›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2012

Segmental chromosomal alterations have prognostic impact in neuroblastoma: a report from the INRG project.

G Schleiermacher, V Mosseri, W B London, J M Maris, G M Brodeur, E Attiyeh, M Haber, J Khan, A Nakagawara, F Speleman and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A multiparameter diagnostic model based on 2-[Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 19 institutions in 10 countries.

G SchleiermacherINSERM U, Laboratoire de Génétique et Biologie des Cancers, Institut Curie, Paris, France. gudrun.schleiermacher@curie.net
V Mosseri
W B London
J M Maris
G M Brodeur
E Attiyeh
M Haber
J Khan
A Nakagawara
F Speleman
R Noguera
G P Tonini
M Fischer
I Ambros
T Monclair
K K Matthay
P Ambros
S L Cohn
A D J Pearson
Chiba Cancer Center · JPChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USComer Children's Hospital · USGhent University Hospital · BEHarvard University · USInserm · FRInstitut Curie · FRNational Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Research Institute · GBOslo University Hospital · NOPhiladelphia University · USRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research InstituteSt Anna Children's Hospital · ATUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital · USUniversitat de València · ESUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Predicting Response Prognosis in Pediatric CancersZIASC010366 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI KHAN, JAVED · 2009 to 2025
$4.7M
MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF NEUROBLASTOMAR01CA039771 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRODEUR, GARRETT M · 1985 to 2013
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA039771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the INRG dataset, the hypothesis that any segmental chromosomal alteration might be of prognostic impact in neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification (MNA) was tested.

methodsThe presence of any segmental chromosomal alteration (chromosome 1p deletion, 11q deletion and/or chromosome 17q gain) defined a segmental genomic profile. Only tumours with a confirmed unaltered status for all three chromosome arms were considered as having no segmental chromosomal alterations.

resultsAmong the 8800 patients in the INRG database, a genomic type could be attributed for 505 patients without MNA: 397 cases had a segmental genomic type, whereas 108 cases had an absence of any segmental alteration. A segmental genomic type was more frequent in patients >18 months and in stage 4 disease (P<0.0001). In univariate analysis, 11q deletion, 17q gain and a segmental genomic type were associated with a poorer event-free survival (EFS) (P<0.0001, P=0.0002 and P<0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis modelling EFS, the parameters age, stage and a segmental genomic type were retained in the model, whereas the individual genetic markers were not (P<0.0001 and RR=2.56; P=0.0002 and RR=1.8; P=0.01 and RR=1.7, respectively).

conclusionA segmental genomic profile, rather than the single genetic markers, adds prognostic information to the clinical markers age and stage in neuroblastoma patients without MNA, underlining the importance of pangenomic studies.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17HumansInfantNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsOncogene ProteinsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisMYCN protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsOncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22976801
PMCPMC3494425
OpenAlexW2150823346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.