ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2013
Oxybutynin: past, present, and future.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Introducing personalized patient care in overactive bladder management using the MedRing OAB system for intravaginal oxybutynin administration.Drug delivery · 2026Article
- Intravaginal Delivery of Oxybutynin: An Alternative Administration Route to Improve its Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effects.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Article
- Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: How Can We Manage It?International neurourology journal · 2020Article
- Cognitive Function and Urologic Medications for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.International neurourology journal · 2020Article
- Novel targeted bladder drug-delivery systems: a review.Research and reports in urology · 2015Review
- The vagina as a route for drug delivery: a review.International urogynecology journal · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxybutynin chloride is primarily indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). It remains the most widely prescribed compound for OAB in the world. OAB is defined as the presence of urinary urgency, usually accompanied by daytime urinary frequency and nocturia, with or without urgency urinary incontinence, in the absence of infection or other identifiable etiology. This is a significant problem for men and women said to affect over 33 million adults in the USA, with the prevalence increasing with age. These symptoms can alter quality of life, with both physical and psychological impairment, as well as cause significant financial burden including the cost of sanitary supplies and decreased work productivity. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods may be employed to aid in the treatment of OAB. The mainstay of treatment for OAB relies on pharmacological management, most specifically treatment with antimuscarinic medications. These medications are thought to prevent involuntary bladder contractions and/or urgency by inhibiting the muscarinic receptors within the urothelium and detrusor muscle. Currently, there are six different medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of OAB, with more than nine formulations including immediate- and extended-release tablets, transdermal patch and gel, vaginal ring, and suppository. This review will focus specifically on oxybutynin chloride, which has been used to treat OAB for four decades in numerous formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.