Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22976505›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2012

Evaluation of a predevelopment service delivery intervention: an application to improve clinical handovers.

Guiqing Lily Yao, Nicola Novielli, Semira Manaseki-Holland, Yen-Fu Chen, Marcel van der Klink, Paul Barach, Peter J Chilton, Richard J Lilford, European HANDOVER Research Collaborative

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Headroom Analysis for Early Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guiqing Lily YaoDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicola Novielli
Semira Manaseki-Holland
Yen-Fu Chen
Marcel van der Klink
Paul Barach
Peter J Chilton
Richard J Lilford
European HANDOVER Research Collaborative

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1209-10099Medical Research Council G0800808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed a method to estimate the expected cost-effectiveness of a service intervention at the design stage and 'road-tested' the method on an intervention to improve patient handover of care between hospital and community.

methodThe development of a nine-step evaluation framework: 1. Identification of multiple endpoints and arranging them into manageable groups; 2. Estimation of baseline overall and preventable risk; 3. Bayesian elicitation of expected effectiveness of the planned intervention; 4. Assigning utilities to groups of endpoints; 5. Costing the intervention; 6. Estimating health service costs associated with preventable adverse events; 7. Calculating health benefits; 8. Cost-effectiveness calculation; 9. Sensitivity and headroom analysis.

resultsLiterature review suggested that adverse events follow 19% of patient discharges, and that one-third are preventable by improved handover (ie, 6.3% of all discharges). The intervention to improve handover would reduce the incidence of adverse events by 21% (ie, from 6.3% to 4.7%) according to the elicitation exercise. Potentially preventable adverse events were classified by severity and duration. Utilities were assigned to each category of adverse event. The costs associated with each category of event were obtained from the literature. The unit cost of the intervention was €16.6, which would yield a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gain per discharge of 0.010. The resulting cost saving was €14.3 per discharge. The intervention is cost-effective at approximately €214 per QALY under the base case, and remains cost-effective while the effectiveness is greater than 1.6%.

conclusionsWe offer a usable framework to assist in ex ante health economic evaluations of health service interventions.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareBayes TheoremCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareDiffusion of InnovationHealth Care CostsHumansMedical ErrorsModels, EconomicOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient HandoffPatient SatisfactionQuality-Adjusted Life YearsResearch DesignRisk ManagementSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22976505
PMCPMC3551195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.