Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22976035›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012

Identification of motions in membrane proteins by elastic network models and their experimental validation.

Basak Isin, Kalyan C Tirupula, Zoltán N Oltvai, Judith Klein-Seetharaman, Ivet Bahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrated Computational Approaches and Tools forAllosteric Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Probing the Structural Dynamics of theFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Computational Ways to Enhance Protein Inhibitor Design.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Basak IsinDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kalyan C Tirupula
Zoltán N Oltvai
Judith Klein-Seetharaman
Ivet Bahar

Funding

Integrated Antimicrobial Drug Discovery Scheme for Multidrug Resistant BacteriaU01AI070499 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI OLTVAI, ZOLTAN N. · 2006 to 2010
$3.0M
Bridging Sequence Patterns and Structural DynamicsR01LM007994 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2004 to 2011
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070499NLM NIH HHS 5R01LM007994-06NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the functional motions of membrane proteins is difficult because they range from large-scale collective dynamics to local small atomic fluctuations at different timescales that are difficult to measure experimentally due to the hydrophobic nature of these proteins. Elastic Network Models, and in particular their most widely used implementation, the Anisotropic Network Model (ANM), have proven to be useful computational methods in many recent applications to predict membrane protein dynamics. These models are based on the premise that biomolecules possess intrinsic mechanical characteristics uniquely defined by their particular architectures. In the ANM, interactions between residues in close proximity are represented by harmonic potentials with a uniform spring constant. The slow mode shapes generated by the ANM provide valuable information on the global dynamics of biomolecules that are relevant to their function. In its recent extension in the form of ANM-guided molecular dynamics (MD), this coarse-grained approach is augmented with atomic detail. The results from ANM and its extensions can be used to guide experiments and thus speedup the process of quantifying motions in membrane proteins. Testing the predictions can be accomplished through (a) direct observation of motions through studies of structure and biophysical probes, (b) perturbation of the motions by, e.g., cross-linking or site-directed mutagenesis, and (c) by studying the effects of such perturbations on protein function, typically through ligand binding and activity assays. To illustrate the applicability of the combined computational ANM-experimental testing framework to membrane proteins, we describe-alongside the general protocols-here the application of ANM to rhodopsin, a prototypical member of the pharmacologically relevant G-protein coupled receptor family.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMotionBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinElasticityMembrane ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein Structure, SecondaryReproducibility of ResultsRetinaldehydeRhodopsinMembrane ProteinsRetinaldehydeRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID22976035
PMCPMC4801040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.