ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012
Identification of motions in membrane proteins by elastic network models and their experimental validation.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein Dynamics to Define and Refine Disordered Protein Ensembles.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Allosteric Communications between Domains Modulate the Activity of Matrix Metalloprotease-1.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Integrated Computational Approaches and Tools forAllosteric Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Characterizing and Predicting Protein Hinges for Mechanistic Insight.Journal of molecular biology · 2020Article
- Probing the Structural Dynamics of theFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Computational Ways to Enhance Protein Inhibitor Design.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Current Advances in Studying Clinically Relevant Transporters of the Solute Carrier (SLC) Family by Connecting Computational Modeling and Data Science.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- Revealing an outward-facing open conformational state in a CLC Cl(-)/H(+) exchange transporter.eLife · 2016Article
- X-ray refinement significantly underestimates the level of microscopic heterogeneity in biomolecular crystals.Nature communications · 2014Article
- Dual function of mitochondrial Nm23-H4 protein in phosphotransfer and intermembrane lipid transfer: a cardiolipin-dependent switch.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the functional motions of membrane proteins is difficult because they range from large-scale collective dynamics to local small atomic fluctuations at different timescales that are difficult to measure experimentally due to the hydrophobic nature of these proteins. Elastic Network Models, and in particular their most widely used implementation, the Anisotropic Network Model (ANM), have proven to be useful computational methods in many recent applications to predict membrane protein dynamics. These models are based on the premise that biomolecules possess intrinsic mechanical characteristics uniquely defined by their particular architectures. In the ANM, interactions between residues in close proximity are represented by harmonic potentials with a uniform spring constant. The slow mode shapes generated by the ANM provide valuable information on the global dynamics of biomolecules that are relevant to their function. In its recent extension in the form of ANM-guided molecular dynamics (MD), this coarse-grained approach is augmented with atomic detail. The results from ANM and its extensions can be used to guide experiments and thus speedup the process of quantifying motions in membrane proteins. Testing the predictions can be accomplished through (a) direct observation of motions through studies of structure and biophysical probes, (b) perturbation of the motions by, e.g., cross-linking or site-directed mutagenesis, and (c) by studying the effects of such perturbations on protein function, typically through ligand binding and activity assays. To illustrate the applicability of the combined computational ANM-experimental testing framework to membrane proteins, we describe-alongside the general protocols-here the application of ANM to rhodopsin, a prototypical member of the pharmacologically relevant G-protein coupled receptor family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.