Beneficence, clinical urgency, and the return of individual research results to relatives.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2022
   Article
2. Should Health Systems Share Genetic Findings With At-Risk Relatives When the Proband Is Deceased? Interviews With Individuals Diagnosed With Lynch Syndrome.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022
   Article
3. An Examination of the Ethical and Legal Limits in Implementing "Traceback Testing" for Deceased Patients.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2022
   Article
4. Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
   Article
5. Patients' Choices for Return of Exome Sequencing Results to Relatives in the Event of Their Death.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015
   Article
6. Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015
   Article
7. Response to open peer commentaries on "Genomic inheritances: disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives".The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Genomic inheritances: disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives.2012

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as