ArticleJournal of anatomy2012
A new ontology (structured hierarchy) of human developmental anatomy for the first 7 weeks (Carnegie stages 1-20).
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- RTX-KG2: a system for building a semantically standardized knowledge graph for translational biomedicine.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Normal Table of Xenopus development: a new graphical resource.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Planarian Anatomy Ontology: a resource to connect data within and across experimental platforms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
- Comprehensive anatomic ontologies for lung development: A comparison of alveolar formation and maturation within mouse and human lung.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2019Article
- Mouse anatomy ontologies: enhancements and tools for exploring and integrating biomedical data.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015Article
- My Corporis Fabrica Embryo: An ontology-based 3D spatio-temporal modeling of human embryo development.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2015Article
- Developing the eHistology Atlas.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Unification of multi-species vertebrate anatomy ontologies for comparative biology in Uberon.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- In silico approaches and the role of ontologies in aging research.Rejuvenation research · 2013Article
- The ontology of craniofacial development and malformation for translational craniofacial research.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2013Review
- Human Development Domain of the Ontology of Craniofacial Development and Malformation.CEUR workshop proceedings · 2013Article
- Systems biology - the broader perspective.Cells · 2013Article
- Preliminary evaluation of the CellFinder literature curation pipeline for gene expression in kidney cells and anatomical parts.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes a new ontology of human developmental anatomy covering the first 49 days [Carnegie stages (CS)1-20], primarily structured around the parts of organ systems and their development. The ontology includes more than 2000 anatomical entities (AEs) that range from the whole embryo, through organ systems and organ parts down to simple or leaf tissues (groups of cells with the same morphological phenotype), as well as features such as cavities. Each AE has assigned to it a set of facts of the form <AE><relationship><parent>, with the relationships including starts_at and ends_at (CSs), part_of (there can be several parents) and is_a (this gives the type of tissue, from an organ system down to one of ~ 80 simple tissues predominantly composed of a single cell kind, which is also specified). Leaf tissues also have a develops_from link to its parent tissue. The ontology includes ~14 000 such facts, which are mainly from the literature and an earlier ontology of human developmental anatomy (EHDAA, now withdrawn). The relationships enable these facts to be integrated into a single, complex hierarchy (or mathematical graph) that was made and can be viewed in the OBO-Edit browser (oboedit.org). Each AE has an EHDAA2 ID that may be useful in an informatics context, while the ontology as a whole can be used for organizing databases of human development. It is also a knowledge resource: a user can trace the lineage of any tissue back to the egg, study the changes in cell phenotype that occur as a tissue develops, and use the structure to add further (e.g. molecular) information. The ontology may be downloaded from www.obofoundry.org. Queries and corrections should be sent to j.bard@ed.ac.uk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.