Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22973540›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2012

Location-dependent empirical thresholds for quantitative trait mapping.

Jason LaCombe, Benjamin McClosky, Steven Tanksley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason LaCombeNature Source Genetics, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA. jlacombe@naturesourcegenetics.com
Benjamin McClosky
Steven Tanksley
Ithaca College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Churchill-Doerge approach toward constructing empirical thresholds has received widespread use in the genetic mapping literature through the past 16 years. The method is valued for both its simplicity and its ability to preserve the genome-wide error rate at a prespecified level. However, the Churchill-Doerge method is not designed to maintain the local (comparison-wise) error rate at a constant level except in situations that are unlikely to occur in practice. In this article, we introduce the objective of preserving the local error rate at a constant level in the context of mapping quantitative trait loci in linkage populations. We derive a method that preserves the local error rate at a constant level, provide an application via simulation on a Hordeum vulgare population, and demonstrate evidence of the relationship between recombination and location bias. Furthermore, we indicate that this method is equivalent to the Churchill-Doerge method when several assumptions are satisfied.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociComputer SimulationGenetic LinkageGenomicsLod Scoreadjusted P-valueempirical thresholdlocal error ratemultiple hypothesis testingQTL

Identifiers

PMID22973540
PMCPMC3429917
OpenAlexW2071770088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.