Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22973300›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2012

Bayesian methods for multivariate modeling of pleiotropic SNP associations and genetic risk prediction.

Stephen W Hartley, Stefano Monti, Ching-Ti Liu, Martin H Steinberg, Paola Sebastiani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multivariate Analysis and Modelling of multiple Brain endOphenotypes: Let's MAMBO!Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A regression framework to uncover pleiotropy in large-scale electronic health record data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. PleioGRiP: genetic risk prediction with pleiotropy.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen W HartleyDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health Boston, MA, USA.
Stefano Monti
Ching-Ti Liu
Martin H Steinberg
Paola Sebastiani
Boston University · US

Funding

Genome Wide Association of Coronary Artery Disease and Related Risk FactorsR01HL089655 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BROECKEL, ULRICH · 2008 to 2012
$3.8M
Effect of non genetic factors on genetic signatures of complex traitsR21HL114237 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2012 to 2014
$480k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089655NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL114237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous associations between genetic loci and individual phenotypes; however, relatively few GWAS have attempted to detect pleiotropic associations, in which loci are simultaneously associated with multiple distinct phenotypes. We show that pleiotropic associations can be directly modeled via the construction of simple Bayesian networks, and that these models can be applied to produce single or ensembles of Bayesian classifiers that leverage pleiotropy to improve genetic risk prediction. The proposed method includes two phases: (1) Bayesian model comparison, to identify Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with one or more traits; and (2) cross-validation feature selection, in which a final set of SNPs is selected to optimize prediction. To demonstrate the capabilities and limitations of the method, a total of 1600 case-control GWAS datasets with two dichotomous phenotypes were simulated under 16 scenarios, varying the association strengths of causal SNPs, the size of the discovery sets, the balance between cases and controls, and the number of pleiotropic causal SNPs. Across the 16 scenarios, prediction accuracy varied from 90 to 50%. In the 14 scenarios that included pleiotropically associated SNPs, the pleiotropic model search and prediction methods consistently outperformed the naive model search and prediction. In the two scenarios in which there were no true pleiotropic SNPs, the differences between the pleiotropic and naive model searches were minimal. To further evaluate the method on real data, a discovery set of 1071 sickle cell disease (SCD) patients was used to search for pleiotropic associations between cerebral vascular accidents and fetal hemoglobin level. Classification was performed on a smaller validation set of 352 SCD patients, and showed that the inclusion of pleiotropic SNPs may slightly improve prediction, although the difference was not statistically significant. The proposed method is robust, computationally efficient, and provides a powerful new approach for detecting and modeling pleiotropic disease loci.

Indexed as

BayesianGWASpleiotropypredictionSNP

Identifiers

PMID22973300
PMCPMC3438684
OpenAlexW2041448690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.