Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22973298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2012

Translesion DNA polymerases and cancer.

Nick M Makridakis, Juergen K V Reichardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role and application prospects of ANXA1 in gastric cancer cells.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. ATAD5 functions as a regulatory platform for Ub-PCNA deubiquitination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Polθ Inhibition: An Anticancer Therapy for HR-Deficient Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Predicting the Prognostic Value ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nick M MakridakisTulane Cancer Center and Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA.
Juergen K V Reichardt

Funding

Mentoring a Cancer Genetics ProgramP20GM103518 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DEININGER, PRESCOTT L. · 2012 to 2013
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair has been regarded as an important barrier to carcinogenesis. The newly discovered field of translesion synthesis (TLS) has made it apparent that mammalian cells need distinct polymerases to efficiently and accurately bypass DNA lesions. Perturbation of TLS polymerase activity by mutation, loss of expression, etc. is expected to result in the accumulation of mutations in cells exposed to specific carcinogens. Furthermore, several TLS polymerases can modulate cellular sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. TLS genes and TLS gene variations may thus be attractive pharmacologic and/or pharmacogenetic targets. We review herein current data with regards to the potential contribution of the primary TLS polymerase genes to cancer, their interaction with pharmacologic agents, and identify areas of interest for further research.

Indexed as

DNA damageerror-proneinstabilitypharmacogenetics

Identifiers

PMID22973298
PMCPMC3434439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.