Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22973270›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2012

Competition for IL-2 between Regulatory and Effector T Cells to Chisel Immune Responses.

Thomas Höfer, Oleg Krichevsky, Grégoire Altan-Bonnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. NaCl enhances CD8Nature immunology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Engineering of Interleukin-2 for Enhanced Therapeutic Activity in Autoimmune Diseases.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Probing T-cell activation in nanoliter tumor co-cultures using membrane displacement trap arrays.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas HöferDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Germany.
Oleg Krichevsky
Grégoire Altan-Bonnet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we discuss how the competition for cytokines between different cells of the immune system can shape the system wide immune response. We focus on interleukin-2 (IL-2) secretion by activated effector T cells (T(eff)) and on the competition for IL-2 consumption between T(eff) and regulatory T cells (T(reg)). We discuss the evidence for the mechanism in which the depletion of IL-2 by T(reg) cells would be sufficient to suppress an autoimmune response, yet not strong enough to prevent an immune response. We present quantitative estimations and summarize our modeling effort to show that the tug-of-war between T(reg) and T(eff) cells for IL-2 molecules can be won by T(reg) cells in the case of weak activation of T(eff) leading to the suppression of the immune response. Or, for strongly activated T(eff) cells, it can be won by T(eff) cells bringing about the activation of the whole adaptive immune system. Finally, we discuss some recent applications attempting to achieve clinical effects through the modulation of IL-2 consumption by T(reg) compartment.

Indexed as

computational modelingcytokine competitionIL-2regulatory T cellssystems immunology

Identifiers

PMID22973270
PMCPMC3433682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.