Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22972619›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2012

PPM: a side-chain and backbone chemical shift predictor for the assessment of protein conformational ensembles.

Da-Wei Li, Rafael Brüschweiler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Resolution in cryogenic solid state NMR: Challenges and solutions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Conformational ensembles explain NMR spectra of frozen intrinsically disordered proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Da-Wei LiChemical Sciences Laboratory, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Rafael Brüschweiler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of the wide availability of protein backbone and side-chain NMR chemical shifts with advances in understanding of their relationship to protein structure makes these parameters useful for the assessment of structural-dynamic protein models. A new chemical shift predictor (PPM) is introduced, which is solely based on physical-chemical contributions to the chemical shifts for both the protein backbone and methyl-bearing amino-acid side chains. To explicitly account for the effects of protein dynamics on chemical shifts, PPM was directly refined against 100 ns long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of 35 proteins with known experimental NMR chemical shifts. It is found that the prediction of methyl-proton chemical shifts by PPM from MD ensembles is improved over other methods, while backbone Cα, Cβ, C', N, and H(N) chemical shifts are predicted at an accuracy comparable to the latest generation of chemical shift prediction programs. PPM is particularly suitable for the rapid evaluation of large protein conformational ensembles on their consistency with experimental NMR data and the possible improvement of protein force fields from chemical shifts.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProtonsSoftwareProteinsProtons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.