Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22972298›Full record

ReviewNature2012

Genomic approaches to studying the human microbiota.

George M Weinstock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 256 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
256citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

256 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Role of Genital Tract Microbiome in Fertility: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Japanese gut microbiome: ecology, uniqueness, and impact on health and disease.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. [Gut microbiota involved in cancer invasion and metastasis].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

196 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

George M WeinstockThe Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA. gweinsto@genome.wustl.edu

Funding

Sequencing the Human MicrobiomeU54HG004968 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, RICHARD K. · 2009 to 2012
$16.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human body is colonized by a vast array of microbes, which form communities of bacteria, viruses and microbial eukaryotes that are specific to each anatomical environment. Every community must be studied as a whole because many organisms have never been cultured independently, and this poses formidable challenges. The advent of next-generation DNA sequencing has allowed more sophisticated analysis and sampling of these complex systems by culture-independent methods. These methods are revealing differences in community structure between anatomical sites, between individuals, and between healthy and diseased states, and are transforming our view of human biology.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBacteriaGenomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenome

Identifiers

PMID22972298
PMCPMC3665339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.