Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22972191›Full record

ArticleNature2012

Restoration of auditory evoked responses by human ES-cell-derived otic progenitors.

Wei Chen, Nopporn Jongkamonwiwat, Leila Abbas, Sarah Jacob Eshtan, Stuart L Johnson, Stephanie Kuhn, Marta Milo, Johanna K Thurlow, Peter W Andrews, Walter Marcotti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stem cell-based and gene editing strategies in the treatment of congenital and acquired sensorineural hearing loss: a narrative review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Neural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Horizons.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Reconstruction of Peripheral Auditory Circuit: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wei ChenCentre for Stem Cell Biology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Nopporn Jongkamonwiwat
Leila Abbas
Sarah Jacob Eshtan
Stuart L Johnson
Stephanie Kuhn
Marta Milo
Johanna K Thurlow
Peter W Andrews
Walter Marcotti
Harry D Moore
Marcelo N Rivolta

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700785Medical Research Council G0801059Medical Research Council G0900919Medical Research Council G0900919(92659)Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 088719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deafness is a condition with a high prevalence worldwide, produced primarily by the loss of the sensory hair cells and their associated spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). Of all the forms of deafness, auditory neuropathy is of particular concern. This condition, defined primarily by damage to the SGNs with relative preservation of the hair cells, is responsible for a substantial proportion of patients with hearing impairment. Although the loss of hair cells can be circumvented partially by a cochlear implant, no routine treatment is available for sensory neuron loss, as poor innervation limits the prospective performance of an implant. Using stem cells to recover the damaged sensory circuitry is a potential therapeutic strategy. Here we present a protocol to induce differentiation from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) using signals involved in the initial specification of the otic placode. We obtained two types of otic progenitors able to differentiate in vitro into hair-cell-like cells and auditory neurons that display expected electrophysiological properties. Moreover, when transplanted into an auditory neuropathy model, otic neuroprogenitors engraft, differentiate and significantly improve auditory-evoked response thresholds. These results should stimulate further research into the development of a cell-based therapy for deafness.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCell LineCells, CulturedCochlear NerveDeafnessEmbryonic Stem CellsFibroblast Growth Factor 10Fibroblast Growth Factor 3Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGerbillinaeHair Cells, AuditoryHumansFGF10 protein, humanFGF3 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor 10Fibroblast Growth Factor 3

Identifiers

PMID22972191
PMCPMC3480718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.