Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22972140›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour.

Trudy Klomp, Mireille van Poppel, Leanne Jones, Janine Lazet, Marcello Di Nisio, Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02783508 (Pethidine Versus Nitrous Oxide for Pain Relief During Labor Among Multiparous. A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02783508 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Pethidine Versus Nitrous Oxide for Pain Relief During Labor Among Multiparous. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaEmek Medical Center, IsraelRan2016 to 2019Enrolled214ConditionsLabor PainArmsIV Meperidine, Nitrous Oxide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anaesthesia/analgesia for manual removal of retained placenta.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Immersion in water during labour and birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  10. Non-opioid drugs for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  11. Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  12. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Lethal nitrous oxide (NJournal of medical case reports · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Trudy KlompDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center,Amsterdam, Netherlands. trudyklomp@planet.nl.
Mireille van Poppel
Leanne Jones
Janine Lazet
Marcello Di Nisio
Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLLiverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust · GBRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

Department of Health 10/4000/02Department of Health SRP/10/4000/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany women would like to have a choice in pain relief during labour and also would like to avoid invasive methods of pain management in labour. Inhaled analgesia during labour involves the self-administered inhalation of sub-anaesthetic concentrations of agents while the mother remains awake and her protective laryngeal reflexes remain intact. Most of the agents are easy to administer, can be started in less than a minute and become effective within a minute.

objectivesTo examine the effects of all modalities of inhaled analgesia on the mother and the newborn for mothers who planned to have a vaginal delivery. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 January 2012), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Current Controlled Trials (2 June 2012), handsearched conference proceedings from the American Society of Clinical Anesthesia (from 1990 to 2011), contacted content experts and trialists and searched reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing inhaled analgesia with other inhaled analgesia or placebo or no treatment or other methods of non-pharmacological pain management in labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility, methodological quality and extracted all data. Data were double checked for accuracy. MAIN

resultsTwenty-six studies, randomising 2959 women, were included in this review.Inhaled analgesia versus a different type of inhaled analgesia Pain relief was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 mm where 100 corresponds to the most relief. Pain intensity was measured using a VAS from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 corresponds to no pain at all and 100 corresponds to the worst pain. The highest score for pain relief is the most positive in contrast to 'pain intensity' in which the higher score is more negative. Flurane derivatives were found to offer better pain relief than nitrous oxide in first stage of labour as measured by a lower pain intensity score (average mean difference (MD) 14.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.41 to 24.37, three studies, 70 women), also a higher pain relief score for flurane derivatives compared with nitrous oxide (average MD -16.32, 95% CI -26.85 to -5.79, two studies, 70 women). Substantial heterogeneity was found in the analyses of pain intensity (P = 0.003) and in the analysis of pain relief (P = 0.002).These findings should be considered with caution because of the questionable design of the included cross-over trials. More nausea was found in the nitrous oxide group compared with the flurane derivatives group (risk ratio (RR) 6.60 95% CI 1.85 to 23.52, two studies, 98 women).Inhaled analgesia versus placebo or no treatment Placebo or no treatment was found to offer less pain relief compared to nitrous oxide (average RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.34, two studies, 310 women; MD -3.50, 95% CI -3.75 to -3.25, one study, 509 women). However, nitrous oxide resulted in more side effects for women such as nausea (RR 43.10, 95% CI 2.63 to 706.74, one study, 509 women), vomiting (RR 9.05, 95% CI 1.18 to 69.32, two studies, 619 women), dizziness (RR 113.98, 95% CI 7.09 to 1833.69, one study, 509 women) and drowsiness (RR 77.59, 95% CI 4.80 to 1254.96, one study, 509 women) when compared with placebo or no treatment.There were no significant differences found for any of the outcomes in the studies comparing one strength versus a different strength of inhaled analgesia, in studies comparing different delivery systems or in the study comparing inhaled analgesia with TENS.Due to lack of data, the following outcomes were not analysed within the review: sense of control; satisfaction with childbirth experience; effect on mother/baby interaction; breastfeeding; admission to special care baby unit; poor infant outcomes at long-term follow-up; or costs. AUTHORS'

conclusionsInhaled analgesia appears to be effective in reducing pain intensity and in giving pain relief in labour. However, substantial heterogeneity was detected for pain intensity. Furthermore, nitrous oxide appears to result in more side effects compared with flurane derivatives. Flurane derivatives result in more drowsiness when compared with nitrous oxide. When inhaled analgesia is compared with no treatment or placebo, nitrous oxide appears to result in even more side effects such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness and drowsiness. There is no evidence for differences for any of the outcomes comparing one strength verus a different strength of inhaled analgesia, comparing different delivery systems or comparing inhaled analgesia with TENS.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesicsAnesthetics, InhalationFemaleHumansLabor PainNitrous OxidePain ManagementPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesicsAnesthetics, InhalationNitrous Oxide

Identifiers

PMID22972140
PMCPMC11627147
OpenAlexW2101161040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.