Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22970908›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2012

Uptake and transfection with polymeric nanoparticles are dependent on polymer end-group structure, but largely independent of nanoparticle physical and chemical properties.

Joel C Sunshine, Daniel Y Peng, Jordan J Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Biodegradable lipophilic polymeric mRNA nanoparticles for ligand-free targeting of splenic dendritic cells for cancer vaccination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Nonviral nanoparticle gene delivery into the CNS for neurological disorders and brain cancer applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joel C SunshineDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States.
Daniel Y Peng
Jordan J Green

Funding

Nanoparticle-mediated peptide delivery for breast cancerR21CA152473 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, JORDAN · 2011 to 2012
$392k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA152473NCI NIH HHS R21CA152473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of nonviral particles for gene delivery requires a greater understanding of the properties that enable gene delivery particles to overcome the numerous barriers to intracellular DNA delivery. Linear poly(beta-amino) esters (PBAE) have shown substantial promise for gene delivery, but the mechanism behind their effectiveness is not well quantified with respect to these barriers. In this study, we synthesized, characterized, and evaluated for gene delivery an array of linear PBAEs that differed by small changes along the backbone, side chain, and end group of the polymers. We examined particle size and surface charge, polymer molecular weight, polymer degradation rate, buffering capacity, cellular uptake, transfection, and cytotoxicity of nanoparticles formulated with these polymers. Significantly, this is the first study that has quantified how small differential structural changes to polymers of this class modulate buffering capacity and polymer degradation rate and relates these findings to gene delivery efficacy. All polymers formed positively charged (zeta potential 21-29 mV) nanosized particles (∼150 nm). The polymers hydrolytically degraded quickly in physiological conditions, with half-lives ranging from 90 min to 6 h depending on polymer structure. The PBAE buffering capacities in the relevant pH range (pH 5.1-7.4) varied from 34% to 95% protonatable amines, and on a per mass basis, PBAEs buffered 1.4-4.6 mmol of H(+)/g. When compared to 25 kDa branched polyethyleneimine (PEI), PBAEs buffer significantly fewer protons/mass, as PEI buffers 6.2 mmol of H(+)/g over the same range. However, due to the relatively low cytotoxicity of PBAEs, higher polymer mass can be used to form particles than with PEI and total buffering capacity of PBAE-based particles significantly exceeds that of PEI. Uptake into COS-7 cells ranged from 0% to 95% of cells and transfection ranged from 0% to 93% of cells, depending on the base polymer structure and the end modifications examined. Five polymers achieved higher uptake and transfection efficacy with less toxicity than branched-PEI control. Surprisingly, acrylate-terminated base polymers were dramatically less efficacious than their end-capped versions, in terms of both uptake (1-3% for acrylate, 75-94% for end-capped) and transfection efficacy (0-1% vs 20-89%), even though there are minimal differences between acrylate and end-capped polymers in terms of DNA retardation in gel electrophoresis, particle size, zeta potential, and cytotoxicity. These studies further elucidate the role of polymer structure for gene delivery and highlight that small molecule end-group modification of a linear polymer can be critical for cellular uptake in a manner that is largely independent of polymer/DNA binding, particle size, and particle surface charge.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsDNAGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansNanoparticlesParticle SizePolymersRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTransfectionDNAenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent Proteinspoly(beta-amino ester)Polymers

Identifiers

PMID22970908
PMCPMC3779641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.