Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22970719›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews2012

The role of cadmium and nickel in estrogen receptor signaling and breast cancer: metalloestrogens or not?

Natalie B Aquino, Mary B Sevigny, Jackielyn Sabangan, Maggie C Louie

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heavy metals in biological samples of cancer patients: a systematic literature review.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cadmium toxicity on endoplasmic reticulum functioning.International journal of biochemistry and molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie B AquinoDepartment of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, CA 94901, USA.
Mary B Sevigny
Jackielyn Sabangan
Maggie C Louie
Dominican University of California · US

Funding

Understanding the Effects of Cadmium on Breast Cancer Cell GrowthR15CA121983 · NCI · DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY · PI LOUIE, MAGGIE C · 2007 to 2012
$715k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA121983NCI NIH HHS R15CA121983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past half-century, incidences of breast cancer have increased globally. Various factors--genetic and environmental--have been implicated in the initiation and progression of this disease. One potential environmental risk factor that has not received a lot of attention is the exposure to heavy metals. While several mechanisms have been put forth describing how high concentrations of heavy metals play a role in carcinogenesis, it is unclear whether chronic, low-level exposure to certain heavy metals (i.e., cadmium and nickel) can directly result in the development and progression of cancer. Cadmium and nickel have been hypothesized to play a role in breast cancer development by acting as metalloestrogens--metals that bind to estrogen receptors and mimic the actions of estrogen. Since the lifetime exposure to estrogen is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer, anything that mimics its activity will likely contribute to the etiology of the disease. However, heavy metals, depending on their concentration, are capable of binding to a variety of proteins and may exert their toxicities by disrupting multiple cellular functions, complicating the analysis of whether heavy metal-induced carcinogenesis is mediated by the estrogen receptor. The purpose of this review is to discuss the various epidemiological, in vivo, and in vitro studies that show a link between the heavy metals, cadmium and nickel, and breast cancer development. We will particularly focus on the studies that test whether these two metals act as metalloestrogens in order to assess the strength of the data supporting this hypothesis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCadmiumChromatinEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansNickelReceptors, EstrogenRisk FactorsSignal TransductionCadmiumChromatinNickelReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID22970719
PMCPMC3476837
OpenAlexW1964886571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.