Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22970228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Technical reproducibility of genotyping SNP arrays used in genome-wide association studies.

Huixiao Hong, Lei Xu, Jie Liu, Wendell D Jones, Zhenqiang Su, Baitang Ning, Roger Perkins, Weigong Ge, Kelci Miclaus, Li Zhang and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. GWAS of longevity in CHARGE consortium confirms APOE and FOXO3 candidacy.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Huixiao HongCenter of Excellence for Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arizona, United States of America. huixiao.hong@fda.hhs.gov
Lei Xu
Jie Liu
Wendell D Jones
Zhenqiang Su
Baitang Ning
Roger Perkins
Weigong Ge
Kelci Miclaus
Li Zhang
Kyunghee Park
Bridgett Green
Tao Han
Hong Fang
Christophe G Lambert
Silvia C Vega
Simon M Lin
Nadereh Jafari
Wendy Czika
Russell D Wolfinger
Federico Goodsaid
Weida Tong
Leming Shi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last several years, high-density genotyping SNP arrays have facilitated genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that successfully identified common genetic variants associated with a variety of phenotypes. However, each of the identified genetic variants only explains a very small fraction of the underlying genetic contribution to the studied phenotypic trait. Moreover, discordance observed in results between independent GWAS indicates the potential for Type I and II errors. High reliability of genotyping technology is needed to have confidence in using SNP data and interpreting GWAS results. Therefore, reproducibility of two widely genotyping technology platforms from Affymetrix and Illumina was assessed by analyzing four technical replicates from each of the six individuals in five laboratories. Genotype concordance of 99.40% to 99.87% within a laboratory for the sample platform, 98.59% to 99.86% across laboratories for the same platform, and 98.80% across genotyping platforms was observed. Moreover, arrays with low quality data were detected when comparing genotyping data from technical replicates, but they could not be detected according to venders' quality control (QC) suggestions. Our results demonstrated the technical reliability of currently available genotyping platforms but also indicated the importance of incorporating some technical replicates for genotyping QC in order to improve the reliability of GWAS results. The impact of discordant genotypes on association analysis results was simulated and could explain, at least in part, the irreproducibility of some GWAS findings when the effect size (i.e. the odds ratio) and the minor allele frequencies are low.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenotypeHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID22970228
PMCPMC3436888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.