Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22970109›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Results of an action-research on epilepsy in rural Mali.

Elisa Bruno, Karamoko Nimaga, Ibrahima Foba, Philippe Vignoles, Pierre Genton, Ogobara Doumbo, Daniel Gérard, Pierre-Marie Preux, Guy Farnarier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Phenobarbital: missing in action.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2012
    Article
  7. Epilepsy genetics in Africa: challenges and future perspectives.North African and Middle East epilepsy journal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa BrunoInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1094, Tropical Neuroepidemiology, University of Limoges, School of Medicine, Institute of Tropical Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Limoges, France.
Karamoko Nimaga
Ibrahima Foba
Philippe Vignoles
Pierre Genton
Ogobara Doumbo
Daniel Gérard
Pierre-Marie Preux
Guy Farnarier
Mali-Folkecenter · MLInserm · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRHôpital Nord · FRSanofi (France) · FRUniversité de Limoges · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the RARE (Réseau Action-Recherche sur l'Epilepsie) program, a model of managing and treating people with epilepsy (PWE) at a primary health-care level in rural areas of Mali, we assessed treatment efficacy and compliance of patients who underwent the first year follow-up.

methodsA network of rural general practitioners (GPs) settled in six rural districts of the regions of Koulikoro, Segou and Sikasso, was involved in the diagnosis, evaluation and monitoring of all the identified PWE and in the distribution of phenobarbital (PB). All the participants were included in a prospective database and followed-up by GPs at 4 months intervals during the first year. Seizure frequency, treatment doses and appearance of adverse events (AEs) were systematically recorded. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of reduction of seizures frequency while noncompliance in terms of time to study withdrawal for any cause. KEY

findings596 patients treated with PB were included in the analysis. Of these, 74.0% completed the first year follow-up. At the final visit, 59.6% were seizure-free: 31.0% for 12 months, 10.2% for 8 months and 18.4% for 4 months. Adults and patients with convulsive seizures were the most drug-resistant (p<0.002). Few AEs were recorded. The multivariate analysis showed that being a woman, presenting convulsive seizures, having more than 5 seizures/month and had never be treated were predictors of withdrawal (p ≤ 0.05) at 12 months. SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed a good response and compliance to the treatment and allowed the identification of some factors associated with failure of management in a setting very near to clinical practice. Awareness campaigns are needed to assure a broader accessibility to treatment and to improve the compliance and continuity with treatment programs.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesRural PopulationAdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalEpilepsyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMaliMultivariate AnalysisAnticonvulsantsPhenobarbital

Identifiers

PMID22970109
PMCPMC3435093
OpenAlexW2016739922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.