ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2012
Long-term efficacy of intermittent peritoneal dialysis using various doses.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peritoneal dialysis treatment for severe lupus nephritis patients complicated with essential organ dysfunction.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to investigate the long-term clinical efficacy of intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD) using various doses and to explore the most suitable dialysis dose and practice pattern for patients. A total of 52 inpatients/outpatients who had undergone IPD for more than 5 years were recruited and divided into three groups according to the dialysis dose: 4 liters in Group A, 6 liters in Group B and 8 liters in Group C. The dwell time was 4 h. All patients were fasted overnight. The dialysis adequacy, nutritional status, complication control, blood pressure and intra-abdominal infection were determined and observed among these patients. Barthel index (BI) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) were employed to measure the activities of daily living (ADL) and degree of depression, respectively. The dialysis adequacy and ultrafiltration volume in Group A were lower than those in Groups B and C, but the residual urine volume was larger than that in the latter two groups. In addition, there was a marked difference in the control of complications between Group A and Groups B and C. When compared to Groups A and B, the nutritional status in Group C was significantly decreased, the mean arterial pressure and intra-abdominal infection rates were dramatically increased, and the HAMD scores were also higher (P<0.05). No significant difference was noted in the BI. For patients undergoing long-term IPD, individualized dialysis dose may benefit the dialysis adequacy, nutritional status, control of complications, blood pressure, rate of intra-abdominal infection, ADL and depression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.