ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2012
Considerations for two inoculation methods of rabbit hepatic tumors: Pathology and image features.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Highly tough and elastic microspheric gel for transarterial catheter embolization in treatment of liver metastasis tumor.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- Establishing a novel model of malignant airway stenosis in rabbit.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous implantation of rabbit VX2 carcinoma, using a coaxial technique and gelfoam pellet injection combination to establish a rabbit liver tumor model.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022Article
- Establishment of Rabbit Liver VX2 Tumor Model Using Percutaneous Puncture Inoculation of Tumor Fragment Guided and Evaluated by Ultrasonography.Current medical science · 2019Article
- Comparison of anesthesia and tumor implantation methods for establishing rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
- Modification of the method to establish a hepatic VX2 carcinoma model in rabbits.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Radio-frequency ablation-based studies on VX2rabbit models for HCC treatment.Infectious agents and cancer · 2016Review
- Comparison of two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Establishing a rabbit model of malignant esophagostenosis using the endoscopic implantation technique for studies on stent innovation.Journal of translational medicine · 2014Article
- Article
- Development, growth, propagation, and angiographic utilization of the rabbit VX2 model of liver cancer: a pictorial primer and "how to" guide.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rabbit VX2 hepatic tumor model has been widely used for the investigation of liver cancer. The present study was designed to compare two inoculation methods in order to identify an improved modality for establishing rabbit hepatic tumors. A total of 44 rabbits were randomly divided into 2 groups. All inoculations were performed by open laparotomy. In group 1, 22 rabbits received a VX2 tumor cell suspension in a volume of 0.2 ml, which was slowly injected into the rabbit liver parenchyma using an 18-gauge needle. In group 2, a 0.2-ml suspension of small, minced tumor fragments of a VX2 carcinoma, inserted into an 18-gauge needle, was implanted into the liver parenchyma. The tumor survival ratio, size and extrahepatic metastases were evaluated and compared using computed tomography (CT)-scan, angiography and pathological specimens. At 2 weeks following implantation, successful liver tumor growth was achieved in 14 out of the 22 rabbits in group 1 (63.6%) and 21 out of the 22 rabbits in group 2 (95.5%) (P<0.05). Further sub-analysis revealed that single nodular tumors in the liver were observed in 4 out of the 14 rabbits in group 1 (28.6%) and 14 out of the 21 rabbits in group 2 (66.7%), and that multinodular tumors in the liver were observed in 10 out of the 14 rabbits in group 1 (71.4%) and 7 out of the 21 rabbits in group 2 (33.3%) (P<0.05). Extrahepatic metastases were observed in 5 out of the 14 rabbits in group 1 (35.7%) and 1 of the 21 rabbits in group 2 (4.8%) (P<0.05). Imaging findings of hepatic tumors were in concordance with histopathology. In conclusion, direct implantation of VX2 tumor fragments into the liver using a fine needle achieved a higher success rate than injecting VX2 tumor cells. The rabbit hepatic tumors inoculated by this method may therefore be a more suitable animal model for investigating liver cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.