ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2012
A population-based study of gefitinib in patients with postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gefitinib treatment in patients with postoperative recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations.International journal of clinical oncology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no standard treatment and there are no clearly defined guidelines for the treatment of postoperative recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a retrospective population-based study to assess the benefits of treatment with gefitinib in patients with a postoperative recurrence of NSCLC in general clinical practice. This retrospective population-based study was conducted on patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC who had been treated with gefitinib at 14 institutions in Ibaraki Prefecture between July 2002 and September 2007. The objective response rate to gefitinib therapy was 37.6% for local and distant recurrence. The median survival time following the start of gefitinib therapy was 12 months, and the one-year and two-year survival rates were 48.9 and 28.9%, respectively. The median survival time of the females was 19 months, and the median survival time of the males was 9 months (p=0.002). Univariate analysis showed that female gender, adenocarcinoma, a performance status (PS) of 0-1 and absence of smoking history were favorable prognostic factors. Only female gender and a PS of 0-1 were independent statistically significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. The rate of greater than grade 1 interstitial lung damage as an adverse event was 3.5%. Gefitinib is a feasible treatment for postoperative recurrent NSCLC in general clinical practice, and a good response and prolonged survival were obtained, similar to the findings reported in published clinical studies that were conducted on highly selected patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.