ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2012
High reward makes items easier to remember, but harder to bind to a new temporal context.
Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positive affect modulates memory by regulating the influence of reward prediction errors.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Reward-motivated memories influence new learning across development.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- ErbB4 in parvalbumin-positive interneurons mediates proactive interference in olfactory associative reversal learning.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- In for a penny, in for a pound: examining motivated memory through the lens of retrieved context models.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Individual differences in experienced and observational decision-making illuminate interactions between reinforcement learning and declarative memory.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Hippocampal contributions to value-based learning: Converging evidence from fMRI and amnesia.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Remembering the best and worst of times: memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2014Article
- Current research and emerging directions in emotion-cognition interactions.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2014Article
- Not all that glittered is gold: neural mechanisms that determine when reward will enhance or impair memory.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Article
- Motivation matters: differing effects of pre-goal and post-goal emotions on attention and memory.Frontiers in psychology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning through reward is central to adaptive behavior. Indeed, items are remembered better if they are experienced while participants expect a reward, and people can deliberately prioritize memory for high- over low-valued items. Do memory advantages for high-valued items only emerge after deliberate prioritization in encoding? Or, do reward-based memory enhancements also apply to unrewarded memory tests and to implicit memory? First, we tested for a high-value memory advantage in unrewarded implicit- and explicit-tests (Experiment 1). Participants first learned high or low-reward values of 36 words, followed by unrewarded lexical decision and free-recall tests. High-value words were judged faster in lexical decision, and more often recalled in free recall. These two memory advantages for high-value words were negatively correlated suggesting at least two mechanisms by which reward value can influence later item-memorability. The ease with which the values were originally acquired explained the negative correlation: people who learned values earlier showed reward effects in implicit memory whereas people who learned values later showed reward effects in explicit memory. We then asked whether a high-value advantage would persist if trained items were linked to a new context (Experiments 2a and 2b). Following the same value training as in Experiment 1, participants learned lists composed of previously trained words mixed with new words, each followed by free recall. Thus, participants had to retrieve words only from the most recent list, irrespective of their values. High- and low-value words were recalled equally, but low-value words were recalled earlier than high-value words and high-value words were more often intruded (proactive interference). Thus, the high-value advantage holds for implicit- and explicit-memory, but comes with a side effect: High-value items are more difficult to relearn in a new context. Similar to emotional arousal, reward value can both enhance and impair memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.