Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22969706›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2012

Direction selectivity in the larval zebrafish tectum is mediated by asymmetric inhibition.

Abhinav Grama, Florian Engert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Brain-Wide Mapping of Water Flow Perception in Zebrafish.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neurons in the most superficial lamina of the mouse superior colliculus are highly selective for stimulus direction.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhinav GramaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA.
Florian Engert
Harvard University · US

Funding

Watching a vertebrate brain learn and behave in a virtual environmentDP1NS082121 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI ENGERT, FLORIAN · 2012 to 2015
$3.4M
Monitoring Neural Activity in Freely Behaving Zebrafish Larvae with BioluminescenR01DA030304 · NIDA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI ENGERT, FLORIAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030304NINDS NIH HHS DP1 NS082121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction of the direction of motion is an important computation performed by many sensory systems and in particular, the mechanism by which direction-selective retinal ganglion cells (DS-RGCs) in the retina acquire their selective properties, has been studied extensively. However, whether DS-RGCs simply relay this information to downstream areas or whether additional and potentially de novo processing occurs in these recipient structures is a matter of great interest. Neurons in the larval zebrafish tectum, the largest retino-recipent area in this animal, show direction-selective (DS) responses to moving visual stimuli but how these properties are acquired is still unknown. In order to study this, we first used two-photon calcium imaging to classify the population responses of tectal cells to bars moving at different speeds and in different directions. Subsequently, we performed in vivo whole cell electrophysiology on these DS tectal neurons and we found that their inhibitory inputs were strongly biased toward the null direction of motion, whereas the excitatory inputs showed little selectivity. In addition, we found that excitatory currents evoked by a stimulus moving in the preferred direction occurred before the inhibitory currents whereas a stimulus moving in the null direction evoked currents in the reverse temporal order. The membrane potential modulations resulting from these currents were enhanced by the spike generation mechanism to generate amplified direction selectivity in the spike output. Thus, our results implicate a local inhibitory circuit in generating direction selectivity in tectal neurons.

Indexed as

asymmetric inhibitiondirection selectivitytectumvisionzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID22969706
PMCPMC3432856
OpenAlexW2159581916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.