ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2012
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography parameters in neural network diagnosis of liver tumors.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: A Systematic Review.Digestion · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning for malignant versus benign focal liver lesions on US and CEUS: a meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Pooled it
- Contrast-enhanced US for characterization of focal liver lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis.European radiology · 2018Pooled it
- Images Versus Videos in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Computer-Aided Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep-learning-based washout classification for decision support in contrast-enhanced ultrasound examinations of the liver.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence techniques in liver cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Diagnostic Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Patients with Liver Lesions: A Comparative Study with Clinicians.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.eGastroenterology · 2023Review
- An Automated Method for Classifying Liver Lesions in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging Based on Deep Learning Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Ensemble Learning of Multiple Models Using Deep Learning for Multiclass Classification of Ultrasound Images of Hepatic Masses.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Revisiting artificial intelligence diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with DIKWH framework.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Deep Learning Algorithms in the Automatic Segmentation of Liver Lesions in Ultrasound Investigations.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Motion Compensation Method for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Motion in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Focal Liver Lesions.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Ultrasound-based artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence in liver ultrasound.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Deep learning radiomics for focal liver lesions diagnosis on long-range contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical factors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- The feasibility to use artificial intelligence to aid detecting focal liver lesions in real-time ultrasound: a preliminary study based on videos.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo study the role of time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis parameters in a complex system of neural networks designed to classify liver tumors.
methodsWe prospectively included 112 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 41), hypervascular (n = 20) and hypovascular (n = 12) liver metastases, hepatic hemangiomas (n = 16) or focal fatty changes (n = 23) who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Craiova, Romania. We recorded full length movies of all contrast uptake phases and post-processed them offline by selecting two areas of interest (one for the tumor and one for the healthy surrounding parenchyma) and consecutive TIC analysis. The difference in maximum intensities, the time to reaching them and the aspect of the late/portal phase, as quantified by the neural network and a ratio between median intensities of the central and peripheral areas were analyzed by a feed forward back propagation multi-layer neural network which was trained to classify data into five distinct classes, corresponding to each type of liver lesion.
resultsThe neural network had 94.45% training accuracy (95% CI: 89.31%-97.21%) and 87.12% testing accuracy (95% CI: 86.83%-93.17%). The automatic classification process registered 93.2% sensitivity, 89.7% specificity, 94.42% positive predictive value and 87.57% negative predictive value. The artificial neural networks (ANN) incorrectly classified as hemangyomas three HCC cases and two hypervascular metastases, while in turn misclassifying four liver hemangyomas as HCC (one case) and hypervascular metastases (three cases). Comparatively, human interpretation of TICs showed 94.1% sensitivity, 90.7% specificity, 95.11% positive predictive value and 88.89% negative predictive value. The accuracy and specificity of the ANN diagnosis system was similar to that of human interpretation of the TICs (P = 0.225 and P = 0.451, respectively). Hepatocellular carcinoma cases showed contrast uptake during the arterial phase followed by wash-out in the portal and first seconds of the late phases. For the hypovascular metastases did not show significant contrast uptake during the arterial phase, which resulted in negative differences between the maximum intensities. We registered wash-out in the late phase for most of the hypervascular metastases. Liver hemangiomas had contrast uptake in the arterial phase without agent wash-out in the portal-late phases. The focal fatty changes did not show any differences from surrounding liver parenchyma, resulting in similar TIC patterns and extracted parameters.
conclusionNeural network analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography - obtained TICs seems a promising field of development for future techniques, providing fast and reliable diagnostic aid for the clinician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.