Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22968743›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of heart failure2013

Influence of documented history of coronary artery disease on outcomes in patients admitted for worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the EVEREST trial.

Robert J Mentz, Bradley D Allen, Mary J Kwasny, Marvin A Konstam, James E Udelson, Andrew P Ambrosy, Angela J Fought, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Christopher M O'Connor, Faiez Zannad and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of heart failure, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert J MentzDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Bradley D Allen
Mary J Kwasny
Marvin A Konstam
James E Udelson
Andrew P Ambrosy
Angela J Fought
Muthiah Vaduganathan
Christopher M O'Connor
Faiez Zannad
Aldo P Maggioni
Karl Swedberg
Robert O Bonow
Mihai Gheorghiade
Northwestern University · USDuke Medical Center · USTufts Medical Center · USAssociazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri · ITCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRMassachusetts General Hospital · USStanford University · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

UNC-Duke Collaborative Clinical Pharmacology Postdoctoral Training Program-Evaluation SupplementT32GM086330 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KIM L.R. BROUWER, Daniel Gonzalez · 2011 to 2026
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsData on the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have been conflicting. We describe the clinical characteristics and mode-specific outcomes of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and documented CAD in a large randomized trial. METHODS AND

resultsEVEREST was a prospective, randomized trial of vasopressin-2 receptor blockade, in addition to standard therapy, in 4133 patients hospitalized with worsening HF and reduced EF. Patients were classified as having CAD based on patient-reported myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary revascularization. We analysed the characteristics and outcomes [all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) mortality/HF hospitalization] of patients with and without documented CAD. All events were centrally adjudicated. Documented CAD was present in 2353 patients (57%). Patients with CAD were older and had more co-morbidities compared with those without CAD. Patients with CAD were more likely to receive a beta-blocker, but less likely to receive an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or aldosterone antagonist (P < 0.01). After risk adjustment, patients with documented CAD had similar mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.30], but were at an increased risk for CV mortality/HF hospitalization (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12-1.41) due to an increased risk for HF hospitalization (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44). Patients with CAD had increased HF- and MI-related events, but similar rates of sudden cardiac death.

conclusionDocumented CAD in patients hospitalized for worsening HF with reduced EF was associated with a higher burden of co-morbidities, lower use of HF therapies (except beta-blockers), and increased HF hospitalization, while all-cause mortality was similar.

Indexed as

Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor AntagonistsHospitalizationAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart FailureHospital MortalityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID22968743
PMCPMC4176134
OpenAlexW2093561862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.