Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22968648›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2012

Diagnosis of bladder cancer by immunocytochemical detection of minichromosome maintenance protein-2 in cells retrieved from urine.

K Saeb-Parsy, A Wilson, C Scarpini, M Corcoran, S Chilcott, M McKean, B Thottakam, B Rai, G Nabi, D Rana and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03427034 (Determining the Specificity and Sensitivity of the BladderLight™ Assay as a Diagnostic and Risk Stratification Tool for Bladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03427034 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Determining the Specificity and Sensitivity of the BladderLight™ Assay as a Diagnostic and Risk Stratification Tool for Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2020Enrolled2,100ConditionsBladder CancerArmsBladderLight®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Electronic-cigarette smoke induces lung adenocarcinoma and bladder urothelial hyperplasia in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evaluation of transforming growth factor-β1 suppress Pokemon/epithelial-mesenchymal transition expression in human bladder cancer cells.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

K Saeb-ParsyDepartment of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
A Wilson
C Scarpini
M Corcoran
S Chilcott
M McKean
B Thottakam
B Rai
G Nabi
D Rana
M Perera
K Stewart
R A Laskey
D E Neal
N Coleman
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBOsys Technology · GBRobert Gordon University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13080Medical Research Council MC_U105359875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe tested the accuracy of immunocytochemistry (ICC) for minichromosome maintenance protein-2 (MCM-2) in diagnosing bladder cancer, using cells retrieved from urine.

methodsAdequate samples were obtained from 497 patients, the majority presenting with gross haematuria (GH) or undergoing cystoscopic surveillance (CS) following previous bladder cancer. We performed an initial study of 313 patients, followed by a validation study of 184 patients. In all cases, presence/absence of bladder cancer was established by cystoscopy/biopsy.

resultsIn the initial study, receiver operator characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.820 (P<0.0005) for the GH group and 0.821 (P<0.01) for the CS group. Optimal sensitivity/specificity were provided by threshold values of 50+ MCM-2-positive cells in GH samples and 200+ cells in CS samples, based on a minimum total cell number of 5000. Applying these thresholds to the validation data set gave 81.3% sensitivity, 76.0% specificity and 92.7% negative predictive value (NPV) in GH and 63.2% sensitivity, 89.9% specificity and 89.9% NPV in CS. Minichromosome maintenance protein-2 ICC provided clinically relevant improvements over urine cytology, with greater sensitivity in GH and greater specificity in CS (P=0.05).

conclusionsMinichromosome maintenance protein-2 ICC is a reproducible and accurate test that is suitable for both GH and CS patient groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorFemaleHematuriaHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Nuclear ProteinsROC CurveUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsMCM2 protein, humanMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Nuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22968648
PMCPMC3494445
OpenAlexW2019607351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.