ArticleJournal of laboratory automation2013
High-throughput secondary screening at the single-cell level.
Article in Journal of laboratory automation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis between zebrafish and an automated live-cell assay to classify developmental neurotoxicant chemicals.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2023Article
- Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition).European journal of immunology · 2019Article
- Ultra-high throughput functional enrichment of large monoamine oxidase (MAO-N) libraries by fluorescence activated cell sorting.The Analyst · 2018Article
- Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies.European journal of immunology · 2017Article
- Flow Cytometry: Impact on Early Drug Discovery.Journal of biomolecular screening · 2015Review
- Fluorescence-based high-throughput functional profiling of ligand-gated ion channels at the level of single cells.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We have developed an automated system for drug screening using a single-cell-multiple functional response technology. The approach uses a semiautomated preparatory system, high-speed sample collection, and a unique analytical tool that provides instantaneous results for compound dilutions using 384-well plates. The combination of automation and rapid robotic sampling increases quality control and robustness. High-speed flow cytometry is used to collect single-cell results together with a newly defined analytical tool for extraction of IC(50) curves for multiple assays per cell. The principal advantage is the extreme speed of sample collection, with results from a 384-well plate being completed for both collection and data processing in less than 10 min. Using this approach, it is possible to extract detailed drug response information in a highly controlled fashion. The data are based on single-cell results, not populations. With simultaneous assays for different functions, it is possible to gain a more detailed understanding of each drug/compound interaction. Combined with integrated advanced data processing directly from raw data files, the process from sampling to analytical results is highly intuitive. Direct PubMed links allow review of drug structure and comparisons with similar compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.