Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22968366›Full record

SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2012

[Antidepressants for treatment of depression in palliative patients : a systematic literature review].

M Ujeyl, B Müller-Oerlinghausen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02783430 (Evaluation of the Initial Prescription of Ketamine and Milnacipran Forin Depression in Patients With a Progressive Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02783430 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Initial Prescription of Ketamine and Milnacipran Forin Depression in Patients With a Progressive Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LilleRan2016 to 2024Enrolled42ConditionsDepressionArmsKetamine, Milnacipran, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Palliative Care of Adult Patients With Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M UjeylArzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft, Geschäftsstelle, Herbert-Lewin-Platz 1, 10623, Berlin, Deutschland. miriam.ujeyl@akdae.de
B Müller-Oerlinghausen
Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen ÄrzteschaftCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of depression in palliative care must take into account expected benefits and risks of antidepressants in patients with potentially limited life expectancy, poor medical condition, advanced age and higher risk to suffer from side effects and drug interactions. This systematic review assesses evidence of the efficacy and safety of different classes of antidepressants depending on the type and severity of the physical illness.

methodsA systematic database search (Medline, EMBASE) for clinical studies was carried out and references of identified literature were checked. To be included in the review studies had to be performed in illnesses that were part of in the search strategy, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, HIV/AIDS, cancer, COPD and heart failure. Considered were controlled studies comparing the efficacy of antidepressants to placebo, other classes of antidepressants, benzodiazepines, psychostimulants or psychotherapy. In a first step only studies with patients meeting established diagnostic criteria of depression and where depression was a primary endpoint were included. In a second step, additional studies were included that did not meet both of the latter criteria but were performed in patients at the end of life.

resultsA total of 40 trials (mostly using SSRI or NSMRI) were included, 16 studies were performed in neurological, 24 in general medical conditions and 9 studies were performed in patients at the end of life or in advanced disease stages. Due to heterogeneous study designs no conclusions can be drawn if efficacy or tolerability is dependent on disease severity. In most cases, studies might have been too small to detect limited treatment effects. As a lack of efficacy was predominantly shown in larger trials, publication bias might have been present. In most of the reviewed general medical conditions study results were heterogeneous. In contrast to the popularity of the treatment approach, results suggest that SSRIs are not effective in Alzheimer's disease. In Parkinson's disease, negative studies are too small to prove lack of efficacy of SSRIs as present in the majority of trials.

conclusionsThis review of the evidence allows only limited conclusions concerning the use of antidepressants in physical illness disorders at the end of life. The reviewed evidence does not allow direct conclusions to be drawn concerning the use of antidepressants in different disease severities and its benefits compared to other treatment options (psychotherapy, benzodiazepines etc.). The English full text version of this article will be available in SpringerLink as of November 2012 (under "Supplemental").

Indexed as

Adrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicChronic DiseaseDepressive DisorderEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPalliative CarePersonality InventoryRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTerminal CareAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22968366
OpenAlexW3132393210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.