Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22967716›Full record

SynthesisSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2012

Efficacy of brief alcohol screening intervention for college students (BASICS): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Alexandre Fachini, Poliana P Aliane, Edson Z Martinez, Erikson F Furtado

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04025151 (Nurse-led Alcohol Brief Intervention Plus Mobile Personalized Chat-based Support on Reducing Alcohol Use in University Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04025151 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Nurse-led Alcohol Brief Intervention Plus Mobile Personalized Chat-based Support on Reducing Alcohol Use in University Students: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2020 to 2022Enrolled770ConditionsAlcohol MisuseArmsAlcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet, Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM), Real-time chat-based support through IM Apps, General health through SMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. A mobile-based pregaming drinking prevention intervention for college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Online personalized normative alcohol feedback for parents of first-year college students.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2016
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Development and evaluation of a mobile intervention for heavy drinking and smoking among college students.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2014
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre FachiniDepartment of Neurosciences and Behavior, University of Sao Paulo, Av, dos Bandeirantes, 3900-3° andar, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP 14048-900, Brazil. alexandre.fachini@gmail.com
Poliana P Aliane
Edson Z Martinez
Erikson F Furtado
Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital Bandeirantes · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies reported that brief interventions are effective in reducing excessive drinking. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a protocol of brief intervention for college students (BASICS), delivered face-to-face, to reduce risky alcohol consumption and negative consequences.

methodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed by searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Medline, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. A quality assessment of RCTs was made by using a validated scale. Combined mean effect sizes, using meta-analysis random-effects models, were calculated.

results18 studies were included in the review. The sample sizes ranged from 54 to 1275 (median=212). All studies presented a good evaluation of methodological quality and four were found to have excellent quality. After approximately 12 months of follow-up, students receiving BASICS showed a significant reduction in alcohol consumption (difference between means=-1.50 drinks per week, 95% CI: -3.24 to -0.29) and alcohol-related problems (difference between means=-0.87, 95% CI: -1.58 to -0.20) compared to controls.

conclusionsOverall, BASICS lowered both alcohol consumption and negative consequences in college students. Gender and peer factors seem to play an important role as moderators of behavior change in college drinking. Characteristics of BASICS procedure have been evaluated as more favorable and acceptable by students in comparison with others interventions or control conditions. Considerations for future researches were discussed.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupPsychotherapy, BriefRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStudentsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22967716
PMCPMC3499225
OpenAlexW2138234563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.