Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22967262›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2012

A dual-column solid phase extraction strategy for online collection and preparation of continuously flowing effluent streams for mass spectrometry.

Jeffrey R Enders, Christina C Marasco, John P Wikswo, John A McLean

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey R EndersDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Station B 351822, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.
Christina C Marasco
John P Wikswo
John A McLean

Funding

New Methodologies for Accelerating Natural Product DiscoveryR01GM092218 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BACHMANN, BRIAN O, MCLEAN, JOHN ALAN · 2010 to 2018
$2.8M
Elucidation of Leukocyte and Macrophage Biomarker Signatures from Drugs of AbuseRC2DA028981 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSON, HOD, MCLEAN, JOHN ALAN · 2009 to 2010
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS RC2 DA028981NIDA NIH HHS RC2DA028981NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092218NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM092218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current desalination techniques for mass spectrometry-based protocols are problematic for performing temporal response studies where increased temporal resolution requires small samples and faster sampling frequencies, which greatly increases the number of samples and sample preparation time. These challenges are pertinent to cellular dynamics experiments, where it is important to sample the biological system frequently and with as little sample waste as possible. To address these needs, we present a dual-column online solid phase extraction (SPE) approach capable of preconcentrating and preparing a constantly perfusing sample stream, with minimal to no sample loss. This strategy is evaluated for use in microfluidic bioreactor studies specifically aimed at characterizing suitable sample flow rates, temporal resolving power, and analyte concentrations. In this work, we demonstrate that this strategy may be used for flow rates as low as 500 nL/min, with temporal resolving power on the order of 3 min, with analyte loadings ranging from femtomoles to picomoles for metabolites. Under these conditions, recoveries of ca. 80% are obtained even at femtomole loadings.

Indexed as

BioreactorsEquipment DesignMass SpectrometryMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesSaltsSolid Phase ExtractionSalts

Identifiers

PMID22967262
PMCPMC3518407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.