Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22966480›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2012

Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: What should be the best clinical management?

Paolo Usai-Satta, Mariella Scarpa, Francesco Oppia, Francesco Cabras

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Awareness of Lactose Intolerance Disorder in Saudi Arabia Population.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lactose Intolerance: What Your Breath Can Tell You.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paolo Usai-SattaPaolo Usai-Satta, Mariella Scarpa, Francesco Oppia, Francesco Cabras, Gastroenterology Unit, Brotzu Hospital, 09100 Cagliari, Italy.
Mariella Scarpa
Francesco Oppia
Francesco Cabras
Azienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactose malabsorption (LM) is the incomplete hydrolysis of lactose due to lactase deficiency, which may occur as a primary disorder or secondary to other intestinal diseases. Primary adult-type hypolactasia is an autosomal recessive condition resulting from the physiological decline of lactase activity. Different methods have been used to diagnose LM. Lactose breath test represents the most reliable technique. A recent consensus conference has proposed the more physiological dosage of 25 g of lactose and a standardized procedure for breath testing. Recently a new genetic test, based on C/T13910 polymorphism, has been proposed for the diagnosis of adult-type hypolactasia, complementing the role of breath testing. LM represents a well-known cause of abdominal symptoms although only some lactose malabsorbers are also intolerants. Diagnosing lactose intolerance is not straightforward. Many non-malabsorber subjects diagnose themselves as being lactose intolerant. Blind lactose challenge studies should be recommended to obtain objective results. Besides several studies indicate that subjects with lactose intolerance can ingest up to 15 g of lactose with no or minor symptoms. Therefore a therapeutic strategy consists of a lactose restricted diet avoiding the nutritional disadvantages of reduced calcium and vitamin intake.Various pharmacological options are also available. Unfortunately there is insufficient evidence that these therapies are effective. Further double-blind studies are needed to demonstrate treatment effectiveness in lactose intolerance.

Indexed as

Lactose intoleranceLactose malabsorptionTherapeutic options

Identifiers

PMID22966480
PMCPMC3437438
OpenAlexW2066933446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.