Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22966368›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2010

Detection of P53 mutations in different cancer types is improved by cDNA sequencing.

Sylwester Piaskowski, Izabela Zawlik, Malgorzata Szybka, Dominika Kulczycka-Wojdala, Ewelina Stoczynska-Fidelus, Michal Bienkowski, Tadeusz Robak, Renata Kusinska, Dorota Jesionek-Kupnicka, Radzislaw Kordek and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sylwester PiaskowskiDepartment of Molecular Pathology and Neuropathology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 92-216 Lodz.
Izabela Zawlik
Malgorzata Szybka
Dominika Kulczycka-Wojdala
Ewelina Stoczynska-Fidelus
Michal Bienkowski
Tadeusz Robak
Renata Kusinska
Dorota Jesionek-Kupnicka
Radzislaw Kordek
Piotr Rieske
Pawel P Liberski
Medical University of Lodz · PLCopernicus Memorial Hospital · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently published data show discrepancies between P53 cDNA and DNA sequencing results in glioblastoma, colorectal cancer and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma. We hypothesized that similar discrepancies are observed in other types of human cancers. Using DNA and cDNA direct sequencing, we analyzed 40 cases of invasive breast duct carcinoma, 23 cases of acute myeloblastic leukaemia, 12 cases of astrocytoma and 40 cases of soft tissue sarcoma for P53 mutations. Additionally, we used real-time quantitative PCR to estimate the normalized relative P53 expression. In the comparative study, the P53 mutation was detected more frequently when using cDNA sequencing than DNA sequencing in all of the cancer types. Furthermore, several samples presented missense P53 mutations, with visible wild-type nucleotide on the DNA sequence. In contrast, elimination of the wild-type allele or selective overproduction of the mutated allele was observed on the cDNA sequence. P53 expression was not significantly different between the cases with or without P53 mutations. These results indicate that cDNA sequencing improves the detection of P53 mutations in these cancers. We suggest that the true incidence of P53 mutations in these cancers is underestimated at the DNA level, and evaluation of the alteration should be carried out using cDNA analysis.

Identifiers

PMID22966368
PMCPMC3436210
OpenAlexW2096007572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.