ArticleOncology letters2010
Chemosensitivity of lung cancer: Differences between the primary lesion and lymph node metastasis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Downregulation of Ezrin Suppresses Migration Potential in Cervical Cancer Cells.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Modeling lung adenocarcinoma metastases using patient-derived organoids.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Construction of a Diagnostic Model for Lymph Node Metastasis of the Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Preoperative Ultrasound Features and Imaging Omics.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept.Theranostics · 2021Review
- Modeling of Nanotherapy Response as a Function of the Tumor Microenvironment: Focus on Liver Metastasis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Impact ofMolecular and clinical oncology · 2017Article
- Culture and Drug Profiling of Patient Derived Malignant Pleural Effusions for Personalized Cancer Medicine.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, chemosensitivity tests were performed on both primary lesions (PLs) and lymph node metastases (LMs) from surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Differences between the results obtained were evaluated. Operative specimens were obtained from 13 patients with NSCLC [6 with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) and 7 with adenocarcinoma (AD)] whose lymph nodes were confirmed to be positive for metastasis. Both the PL and LM from the same patient were examined immediately after resection. The collagen gel droplet-embedded culture drug sensitivity test (CD-DST) was used as the chemosensitivity test against six anticancer drugs [5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, gemcitabine, docetaxel, vinorelbine and SN-38 (an active metabolite of irinotecan)]. When the growth rate, determined by the T/C ratio (T, signal for viable cells in the treated group and C, signal in the control) was less than 50%, the tumor cells were considered to be sensitive to the drug. Only in 4 cases (2 SQ and 2 AD) was the chemosensitivity of the primary lesion identical to that of LM. In the SQ cases, chemosensitivity of the primary lesions to 5-FU tended to be consistent with that of LMs. In contrast, the primary lesions in 4 of the 7 AD cases were negative for chemosensitivity to 5-FU; however, LMs were sensitive. In many cases, the chemosensitivity of the PLs to each anticancer drug differed from that of the LMs. In conclusion, both primary and metastatic tumors should be examined to ensure maximum clinical efficacy of in vitro drug-sensitivity testing for adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of n1 and n2 NSCLC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.