ArticleOncology letters2010
The use of treosulfan and gemcitabine in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Theoretical and preliminary experimental investigations on the interactions between sugar cryptand and treosulfan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of treosulfan and gemcitabine (TG) has been shown to have activity in ovarian cancer. These two agents are thought to be synergistic, with gemcitabine causing the persistence of treosulfan-induced DNA crosslinks. This study aimed to investigate the response rates, survival and toxicity in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated with TG. A retrospective case note review of the patients treated with TG was performed in one cancer centre between May 1st, 2000 and November 1st, 2005. Estimates of cumulative survival were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Forty-nine patients were identified; median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range, 31-72) and the median follow-up was 45.1 months (range, 12.2-118.3). TG was used as second-, third-, fourth- and fifth-line chemotherapy in 15, 19, 13 and 2 patients, respectively. Fifteen patients (30.6%) had stable disease; 25 (51%), a partial response; 1 (2%), a complete response and 8 (16.3%) had progressive disease. Median survival following diagnosis was 45.1 months and the median relapse-free survival was 12 months. The median survival time from the start of TG was 13.7 months with a relapse-free survival of 6.3 months. The median number of cycles given was 7. The most common toxicity recorded was myelosuppression. There were no treatment-related deaths. TG chemotherapy produced favourable response rates in a heavily pre-treated group of patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. This doublet warrants further investigation in a phase III trial setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.