Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22965280›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2012

Minimizing back exchange in the hydrogen exchange-mass spectrometry experiment.

Benjamin T Walters, Alec Ricciuti, Leland Mayne, S Walter Englander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human coronavirus HKU1 neutralization by glycan receptor mimicry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MultiPassMerger: Automated data processing for multipass cyclic ion mobility HDX-MS.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin T WaltersJohnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1006 Stellar-Chance Labs, 422 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. benth@mail.med.upenn.edu
Alec Ricciuti
Leland Mayne
S Walter Englander
University of Pennsylvania · USJohnson Foundation · US

Funding

Protein structure and function by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry analysisR01GM031847 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ENGLANDER, S. WALTER · 1985 to 2017
$6.3M
STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008275 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WAND, A. JOSHUA · 1988 to 2018
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM08275NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031847NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The addition of mass spectrometry (MS) analysis to the hydrogen exchange (HX) proteolytic fragmentation experiment extends powerful HX methodology to the study of large biologically important proteins. A persistent problem is the degradation of HX information due to back exchange of deuterium label during the fragmentation-separation process needed to prepare samples for MS measurement. This paper reports a systematic analysis of the factors that influence back exchange (solution pH, ionic strength, desolvation temperature, LC column interaction, flow rates, system volume). The many peptides exhibit a range of back exchange due to intrinsic amino acid HX rate differences. Accordingly, large back exchange leads to large variability in D-recovery from one residue to another as well as one peptide to another that cannot be corrected for by reference to any single peptide-level measurement. The usual effort to limit back exchange by limiting LC time provides little gain. Shortening the LC elution gradient by 3-fold only reduced back exchange by ~2%, while sacrificing S/N and peptide count. An unexpected dependence of back exchange on ionic strength as well as pH suggests a strategy in which solution conditions are changed during sample preparation. Higher salt should be used in the first stage of sample preparation (proteolysis and trapping) and lower salt (<20 mM) and pH in the second stage before electrospray injection. Adjustment of these and other factors together with recent advances in peptide fragment detection yields hundreds of peptide fragments with D-label recovery of 90% ± 5%.

Indexed as

AmidesDeuterium Exchange MeasurementEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, MolecularOsmolar ConcentrationPeptidesPeriplasmic Binding ProteinsSignal-To-Noise RatioSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationTemperatureAmidesEscherichia coli ProteinsMalE protein, E coliPeptidesPeriplasmic Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22965280
PMCPMC3515739
OpenAlexW2059003438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.