ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2012
Individual lifetime pollen and nectar foraging preferences in bumble bees.
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Five decades of misunderstanding in the social Hymenoptera: a review and meta-analysis of Michener's paradox.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022Pooled it
- Elevated rates of dietary generalization in eusocial lineages of the secondarily herbivorous bees.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Microbiome assembly and maintenance across the lifespan of bumble bee workers.Molecular ecology · 2023Article
- Resilience of bumblebee foraging behavior despite colony size reduction.Frontiers in insect science · 2022Article
- Virtual pollination trade uncovers global dependence on biodiversity of developing countries.Science advances · 2021Article
- Care-giver identity impacts offspring development and performance in an annually social bumble bee.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Consistent pollen nutritional intake drives bumble bee (Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Ovary activation does not correlate with pollen and nectar foraging specialization in the bumblebeePeerJ · 2018Article
- Patterns of pollen and nectar foraging specialization by bumblebees over multiple timescales using RFID.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants.Functional ecology · 2016Article
- Article
- Bumblebee learning and memory is impaired by chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- High-altitude multi-taskers: bumble bee food plant use broadens along an altitudinal productivity gradient.Oecologia · 2014Article
- Complex-to-predict generational shift between nested and clustered organization of individual prey networks in digger wasps.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foraging specialization plays an important role in the ability of social insects to efficiently allocate labor. However, relatively little is known about the degree to which individual bumble bees specialize on collecting nectar or pollen, when such preferences manifest, and if individuals can alter their foraging preferences in response to changes in the colony workforce. Using Bombus impatiens, we monitored all foraging visits made by every bee in multiple colonies and showed that individual foragers exhibit consistent lifetime foraging preferences. Based upon the distribution of foraging preferences, we defined three forager types (pollen specialists, nectar specialists, and generalists). In unmanipulated colonies, 16-36 % of individuals specialized (≥90 % of visits) on nectar or pollen only. On its first day of foraging, an individual's foraging choices (nectar only, pollen only, or nectar and pollen) significantly predicted its lifetime foraging preferences. Foragers that only collected pollen on their first day of foraging made 1.61- to 1.67-fold more lifetime pollen foraging visits (as a proportion of total trips) than foragers that only collected nectar on their first foraging day. Foragers were significantly larger than bees that stayed only in the nest. We also determined the effect of removing pollen specialists at early (brood present) or later (brood absent) stages in colony life. These results suggest that generalists can alter their foraging preferences in response to the loss of a small subset of foragers. Thus, bumble bees exhibit individual lifetime foraging preferences that are established early in life, but generalists may be able to adapt to colony needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22965265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.