ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2013
Validation of the Korean version of the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Culturally Adapted Versions of Patient Reported Outcome Measures for the Lower Extremity.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023Article
- Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Oxford Knee Score in breast cancer survivors experiencing hormone treatment-related knee dysfunction.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Femoral matched tibia component rotation has little effect on the tibial torsion after total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Estonian version of the Oxford Knee Score.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2022Article
- Reliability and validity of 3 different Chinese versions of the Oxford knee score (OKS).Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score.Journal of orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017Article
- Validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford knee score and assessment of its utility to characterize quality of life of patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis: a multicentric study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Observational
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis of the Arabic version of the oxford knee score in adult male with knee osteoarthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
- Translation and validation of the 12-item Oxford knee score for use in Finland.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
- High correlation of the Oxford Knee Score with postoperative pain, but not with performance-based functioning.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
- Double metal tibial blocks augmentation in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Bone & joint research · 2015Review
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the persian version of the oxford knee score in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2014Article
- The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery.International journal of rheumatology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough translated versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in several languages are available, the absence of a Korean version precludes comparing data from Korea with that from other countries using the OKS. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore evaluated the reliability and validity of the adapted Korean version of the OKS.
methodsWe first translated the English version of the OKS into Korean, then back into English, then held expert committee discussions to finalize the Korean version. We then mailed the Korean version of the VAS for pain, OKS, and the previously validated SF-36 to 142 patients who underwent TKAs for knee osteoarthritis. Factor analysis and reliability assessment using the kappa statistic of agreement for each item, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and Cronbach's alpha were conducted. To determine the subscales of the OKS, we used the factor analysis. We also evaluated concurrent and construct validity by comparing the responses to the OKS with the results of the VAS and SF-36 using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
resultsAll items had a kappa statistic of agreement greater than 0.6. The OKS showed test and retest reliability as follows: OKS, 0.848; Factor 1, 0.867; and Factor 2, 0.819. Internal consistency of Cronbach's alpha was as follows: OKS, 0.932; Factor 1, 0.907; Factor 2, 0.867. The OKS correlated (r = 0.692) with the VAS. The Korean version of the OKS correlated with the SF-36 total and individual domain (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain) scores.
conclusionsThe adapted Korean version of the OKS was translated and showed acceptable measurement properties. The data suggest it is suitable for assessing outcomes in Korean-speaking patients having TKAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.