Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22964855›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2012

Rapid re-expression of CD133 protein in colorectal cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo.

Susann Peickert, Julia Waurig, Claudia Dittfeld, Antje Dietrich, Yvette Garbe, Lydia Kabus, Michael Baumann, Marian Grade, Thomas Ried, Leoni A Kunz-Schughart

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phenotypic diversity of patient-derived melanoma populations in stem cell medium.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Susann PeickertOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Julia Waurig
Claudia Dittfeld
Antje Dietrich
Yvette Garbe
Lydia Kabus
Michael Baumann
Marian Grade
Thomas Ried
Leoni A Kunz-Schughart
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEOncoRay · DENational Cancer Institute · USUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

Identification and functional characterization of colorectal cancer genesZIABC010833 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RIED, THOMAS · 2009 to 2022
$12.1M
Consequences of Genomic Instability and Aneuploidy on the Colorectal Cancer Z01BC010835 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RIED, THOMAS · 2007 to 2008
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies related to the cancer stem cell hypothesis are challenging because of the imperfect tools to identify cell populations of interest and controversy on the usefulness of established cancer cell lines. We previously found CD133 to not be selective for a tumor-propagating or radioresistant population in a near-diploid, microsatellite-instable colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell line. Because of discrepant literature data, we herein systematically analyzed the behavior of microsatellite-stable cell line subpopulations reflecting the more frequent carcinogenesis pathway in spontaneous CRC. CD133⁺ and CD133(-/low) populations were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and further processed. HT29 and SW620 cells were studied in detail in monolayer and/or spheroid culture assays and upon subcutaneous injection in NMRI (nu/nu) mice using a limiting dilution approach. CD133(-/low) HT29 cells showed a significantly lower clonogenic survival and reduced spheroid formation capacity than their CD133⁺ counterparts. However, the cell populations neither differed in growth kinetics and response to treatment in vitro nor in tumor formation capacity when injecting as low as 10 cells. CD133(-/low) HT29 cells rapidly re-expressed CD133 protein in vitro and in vivo as shown by flow cytometry and/or western blot analyses, and they also showed a particular survival benefit under tissue normoxic conditions. In contrast, CD133 protein in the CD133⁺ population was quite stable throughout culturing. The observation of CD133 re-expression and lack of difference in tumor take rate of subpopulations was confirmed in SW620 cells. Here, we found cell density to affect CD133 re-expression in the CD133(-)-sorted population. And even SW480 cells, classified as a CD133⁻ cell line, presented some CD133 protein on their surface upon in vivo engraftment. We conclude that (i) CD133 protein expression shows high plasticity in CRC cell lines, and (ii) in vitro CD133 status on the cell surface neither determines tumorigenic potential nor CD133 profile in vivo.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAnimalsAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGlycoproteinsHCT116 CellsHT29 CellsHumansMiceNeoplasms, ExperimentalPeptidesAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorGlycoproteinsPeptidesPROM1 protein, humanProm1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22964855
PMCPMC7477948
OpenAlexW2073740148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.