Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22964305›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2012

Mapping spatial approximations between the amino terminus of secretin and each of the extracellular loops of its receptor using cysteine trapping.

Maoqing Dong, Xiequn Xu, Alicja M Ball, Joshua A Makhoul, Polo C-H Lam, Delia I Pinon, Andrew Orry, Patrick M Sexton, Ruben Abagyan, Laurence J Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Capturing Peptide-GPCR Interactions and Their Dynamics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Insights into the structure of class B GPCRs.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maoqing DongDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, USA.
Xiequn Xu
Alicja M Ball
Joshua A Makhoul
Polo C-H Lam
Delia I Pinon
Andrew Orry
Patrick M Sexton
Ruben Abagyan
Laurence J Miller

Funding

SECRETIN RECEPTOR STRUCTURE, FUNCTION, AND REGULATIONR01DK046577 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MED, MAYO CLINIC AZ · PI MILLER, LAURENCE J · 1995 to 2013
$4.9M
Secretin Receptor Structure, Function and RegulationR56DK046577 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI MILLER, LAURENCE J · 2014 to 2014
$154k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK46577NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK046577NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK046577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is evident that the carboxyl-terminal region of natural peptide ligands bind to the amino-terminal domain of class B GPCRs, how their biologically critical amino-terminal regions dock to the receptor is unclear. We utilize cysteine trapping to systematically explore spatial approximations among residues in the first five positions of secretin and in every position within the receptor extracellular loops (ECLs). Only Cys(2) and Cys(5) secretin analogues exhibited full activity and retained moderate binding affinity (IC(50): 92±4 and 83±1 nM, respectively). When these peptides probed 61 human secretin receptor cysteine-replacement mutants, a broad network of receptor residues could form disulfide bonds consistent with a dynamic ligand-receptor interface. Two distinct patterns of disulfide bond formation were observed: Cys(2) predominantly labeled residues in the amino terminus of ECL2 and ECL3 (relative labeling intensity: Ser(340), 94±7%; Pro(341), 84±9%; Phe(258), 73±5%; Trp(274) 62±8%), and Cys(5) labeled those in the carboxyl terminus of ECL2 and ECL3 (Gln(348), 100%; Ile(347), 73±12%; Glu(342), 59±10%; Phe(351), 58±11%). These constraints were utilized in molecular modeling, providing improved understanding of the structure of the transmembrane bundle and interconnecting loops, the orientation between receptor domains, and the molecular basis of ligand docking. Key spatial approximations between peptide and receptor predicted by this model (H(1)-W(274), D(3)-N(268), G(4)-F(258)) were supported by mutagenesis and residue-residue complementation studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding, CompetitiveChlorocebus aethiopsCHO CellsCOS CellsCricetinaeCricetulusCysteineDisulfidesHumansLigandsModels, MolecularMutationPeptidesPhenylalanineProlineCysteineDisulfidesLigandsPeptidesPhenylalanineProlineReceptors, Gastrointestinal HormoneReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSecretinsecretin receptorTryptophan

Identifiers

PMID22964305
PMCPMC3509059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.