Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22964258›Full record

ReviewJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2013

Overview of potential procedural and participant-related confounds for neuroimaging of the resting state.

Niall W Duncan, Georg Northoff

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05098587 (Are Changes in Pain Perception Associated With Changes in Brain Activity Patterns in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury and Neuropathic Pain After a Virtual Walking Training Program - A Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05098587 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Are Changes in Pain Perception Associated With Changes in Brain Activity Patterns in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury and Neuropathic Pain After a Virtual Walking Training Program - A Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSwiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRan2021 to 2023Enrolled12ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Neuropathic Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Age differences in predicting working memory performance from network-based functional connectivity.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niall W DuncanMind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Research Unit, University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, Ont. niall.w.duncan@gmail.com
Georg Northoff

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of intrinsic brain activity in the resting state have become increasingly common. A productive discussion of what analysis methods are appropriate, of the importance of physiologic correction and of the potential interpretations of results has been ongoing. However, less attention has been paid to factors other than physiologic noise that may confound resting-state experiments. These range from straightforward factors, such as ensuring that participants are all instructed in the same manner, to more obscure participant-related factors, such as body weight. We provide an overview of such potentially confounding factors, along with some suggested approaches for minimizing their impact. A particular theme that emerges from the overview is the range of systematic differences between types of study groups (e.g., between patients and controls) that may influence resting-state study results.

Indexed as

Confounding Factors, EpidemiologicBrainBrain MappingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingRest

Identifiers

PMID22964258
PMCPMC3581596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.