Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012
A first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending oral dose study to assess the safety and tolerability of LFF571 in healthy volunteers.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter, randomized clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of LFF571 and vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Trial
- Pharmacokinetics of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with moderate Clostridium difficile infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Trial
- Drug Delivery Systems for the Oral Administration of Antimicrobial Peptides: Promising Tools to Treat Infectious Diseases.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021Review
- Investigational Treatment Agents for RecurrentJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2020Review
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infections.Emerging microbes & infections · 2018Review
- Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- YcaO-Dependent Posttranslational Amide Activation: Biosynthesis, Structure, and Function.Chemical reviews · 2017Review
- Antibacterials Developed to Target a Single Organism: Mechanisms and Frequencies of Reduced Susceptibility to the Novel Anti-Clostridium difficile Compounds Fidaxomicin and LFF571.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016Review
- Review
- The potential for emerging therapeutic options for Clostridium difficile infection.Gut microbes · 2014Review
- Kibdelomycin is a potent and selective agent against toxigenic Clostridium difficile.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Article
- Progress in the discovery of treatments for C. difficile infection: A clinical and medicinal chemistry review.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2014Review
- Investigational antimicrobial agents of 2013.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of hospital-acquired infectious diarrhea. LFF571 is a novel inhibitor of the prokaryotic translation elongation factor Tu and is active against a range of bacterial species, including C. difficile. This first-in-human study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending oral doses of LFF571 in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Except for one cohort, LFF571 was given with a high-fat meal to all single-dose cohorts (25 mg, 100 mg, 400 mg, and 1,000 mg). In the multiple-dose cohorts (25 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg every 6 h for 10 days), LFF571 was given without regard to food. A total of 56 subjects completed the study, with 32 and 25 receiving single and multiple doses, respectively. There were no deaths, no serious adverse events, and no subject withdrawals due to an adverse event. The most common adverse event was diarrhea; gastrointestinal pain or distension was also noted. Diarrhea did not develop more frequently among subjects who received LFF571 than among those who received a placebo. LFF571 had limited systemic exposure and high steady-state fecal concentrations. The highest concentration of LFF571 in serum (3.2 ng/ml) was observed after the last dose in a subject who received 200 mg every 6 h for 10 days. LFF571 was generally safe and well tolerated in single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects. The minimal serum and high fecal concentrations support the further development of LFF571 for the treatment of C. difficile infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.